Edited by Harald Wydra and Bjørn Thomassen
Chapter 4: Contemporary political stakes: after-lives of the modern
This chapter claims the need for a contemporary ethos that helps us respond to a confusing and inchoate present. With the decline of meta-narratives and post-modernism, the authors identify the contemporary ethos in a new, ‘third’ movement of Kant’s original question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’ We must still ‘dare to think’, but need to go beyond Kant’s pact with the reigning powers with its separation of spheres of the public and the private or Foucault’s History of the Present, designed to undermine the seeming solidity of prior formations. In the current political conjuncture, ‘to dare to know’ can be identified in the need for different publics to emerge. Such publics can only emerge in relation to specific problems, which in turn require inquiry and concept work. Political anthropology must therefore proceed by inquiry and concept work in order to conceive of the relation between anthropology and the political stakes of practices.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.