Edited by Hans-Joachim Giessmann, Roger Mac Ginty, Beatrix Austin and Christine Seifert
Nepal’s civil war appeared to have no definitive winner. Initiated by a Maoist Party that came to control a majority of the country, it was ended by a peace agreement that saw the country declared a republic, with a new constitution written and the Maoists integrated into Nepali politics. In the decade since the end of conflict, however, traditional caste and ethnic elites have reasserted themselves, and governance has resumed the form it traditionally had, driven by patronage networks and systemic corruption, with the Maoists now also sharing the spoils. It is argued here that despite the apparent changes, Nepal’s politics and social structures have largely survived the period of conflict, betraying many of the promises of social transformation contained in the peace agreement that ended the insurgency. The result is a continuation of many of the issues that were the root causes of the Maoist insurgency.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.