Water and the Law
Show Less

Water and the Law

Towards Sustainability

Edited by Michael Kidd, Loretta Feris, Tumai Murombo and Alejandro Iza

Water and the Law examines the critical relationship between law and the management of water resources in the context of ensuring environmental sustainability. It highlights the central importance of integrated water resources management and cooperation in achieving sustainability. The book considers two broad themes: how law can contribute to the sustainability of water itself and how the law’s regulation of water can contribute to the sustainability of life – both human life as well as that of other species in their natural environment.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: The right to water and its misconceptions, between developed and developing countries

Nicola Lugaresi


In June 2011 two referendaon water issues were held in Italy. The first was commonly known as the referendum against the privatization of water services; the second as the referendum against profits on water services. Simplifying even more, the two referenda were known as the referenda for public water. Their scope, according to promoters of the public consultation, was to guarantee the ‘right to water’ to citizens. The real objects of the referenda – that is, specific issues concerning the management and cost of water services – were artificially, superficially and demagogically connected to a fundamental ‘right’, the right to water, officially affirmed at the international level after decades of discussions. The public debate therefore focused on general principles, forgetting that the referendum is a precise legal and institutional tool, provided by the Italian Constitution (article 75) in order to abrogate a specific piece of legislation. The two referenda were technically (in a legal sense) complex and their contents and possible outcomes were very different from the political and media presentation. Without going into too much detail, the first could have been described as the referendum against (legislative and administrative) favour for private management of water services, and the second as the referendum against the explicit inclusion of private profits into the water services tariffs. The heated campaigning was focused on something different.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.