Handbook of Research Methods in Corporate Social Responsibility
Show Less

Handbook of Research Methods in Corporate Social Responsibility

Edited by David Crowther and Linne Lauesen

Corporate social responsibility now touches upon most aspects of the interaction between business and society. The approaches taken to research in this area are as varied as the topics that are researched; yet this is the first book to address the whole range of methods available. The book identifies the methods available, evaluates their use and discusses the circumstances in which they might be appropriate. It also includes forward-thinking guidance from experienced academics on the future directions of research in the area.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Research methods in organization, management and management accounting: an evaluation of quantitative and qualitative approaches

Miriam Green

Abstract

There has been much controversy as to the advantages and legitimacy both of quantitative and qualitative research methods in the management area and more widely in the social sciences. There have also been differences as to whether one can combine quantitative with qualitative methods, or whether the two approaches are ‘incommensurable’. It is proposed in this chapter to put forward definitions of each research method; outline their main features; discuss their applications with particular reference to the management area; examine their advantages and disadvantages; set out the critiques regarding each method and whether they are ‘commensurable’ with each other or not. These issues are the subject of this chapter, which involves a discussion as to the preponderance of quantitative research methods in mainstream management scholarship (although there is also a significant number of management scholars using qualitative or mixed research methods). Claims for the legitimacy of quantitative over qualitative approaches because of the scientific methods used in the former are examined in the light of what has been written by prominent historians of science such as Kuhn (1970) and Feyerabend (1993), and social theorists, for example Bourdieu (1990). Ultimately an argument is made for commensurability, complementarity and inclusiveness wherever possible.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.