Handbook of Employee Commitment
Show Less

Handbook of Employee Commitment

Edited by John P. Meyer

A high level of employee commitment holds particular value for organizations owing to its impact on organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. This Handbook provides an up-to-date review of theory and research pertaining to employee commitment in the workplace, outlining its value for both employers and employees and identifying key factors in its development, maintenance or decline. Including chapters from leading theorists and researchers from around the world, this Handbook presents cumulated and cutting-edge research exploring what commitment is, the different forms it can take, and how it is distinct from related concepts such as employee engagement, work motivation, embeddedness, the psychological contract, and organizational identification.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 30: Commitment in the Middle East

Aaron Cohen

Abstract

This chapter reviews several aspects of organizational commitment in the Middle East. Because of the limited studies conducted on commitment in the Middle East countries, this chapter relies mostly on studies of Israeli Arabs and their commitment in comparison to that of Israeli Jews, who represent a more Westernized culture. However, other available studies, particularly from Jordan, are also discussed. The review shows that, in general, the commitment level of Arabs is higher than that of Israeli Jews. This is relevant not only to organizational commitment, but also to other commitment foci in the workplace. The chapter also examines the psychometric properties of the dimensions of organizational commitment. The review shows that Arabs experience some difficulty interpreting the statements included in the continuance commitment scale and that there is some overlap between the items of normative and affective commitment; however, among Israeli Jews, these problems were not reported. The review also indicated that organizational commitment, as well as other commitment foci, has a stronger effect on work outcomes for Arabs than for Jews. The author concludes that there is a possibility that commitment is a concept of greater importance for Arabs, whose society is more traditional, than for Israeli Jews. However, further extensive research is needed in Middle Eastern countries in order to reach more established conclusions regarding commitment in this turbulent area.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.