Edited by Henning Lohmann and Ive Marx
In-work poverty (IWP) has emerged as a critical issue in the East Asian welfare states (Japan, Korea and Taiwan) during the past two decades. However, a comparative lens to empirically study IWP in East Asian economies is absent due to the lack of a comparable database. The authors argue that three East Asian welfare states have different patterns of IWP due to different patterns of capitalist structure and labour market. This chapter uses the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) to show different patterns of IWP in East Asia. Japan and Korea adopted a series of social policies, including activation and family policies, under the umbrella of social investment, although in the contexts of different political discourses and trajectories. By contrast, only a few temporary policy measures were introduced to help the working poor in Taiwan.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.