Edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm and Weert Canzler
Chapter 19: Interdisciplinarity put to test: science policy rhetoric vs scientific practice - the case of integrating the social sciences and humanities in Horizon 2020
The push for interdisciplinary research has been one of the most prominent in recent science policy. Increasingly, research institutions and individual researchers are encouraged, sometimes urged, to embrace interdisciplinarity and leave the ‘silos’ of their respective disciplines to open up for collaborative research. However, the rhetoric of interdisciplinarity and the way the concept is being used and referred to in science policy differ quite considerably from interdisciplinarity in scientific practice. While science policy rhetoric and scientific practice are connected, they need to be looked at separately. This is what this chapter sets out to. By examining a particular science policy approach aimed to foster interdisciplinarity, namely the integration of social sciences and humanities in the European Commission’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, the chapter sheds light on the discrepancy between rhetoric and practice and offers some recommendations for future funding programmes.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.