Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells
Chapter 7: A lost proposal in the 2014 Public Procurement Package: is there any life for the proposed public procurement oversight bodies?
The mandatory requirement for a decentralized system of single oversight public bodies entrusted with the monitoring of public procurement included in the 2011 Proposal was quickly abandoned during the legislative negotiations between the Parliament and the Council. Therefore, the 2014 Directive only imposes a general duty of monitoring the application of the EU public procurement rules that can be entrusted to any entity or national structure. The main reasons given by the Parliament and the Council for this amendment were that the demand for a unique specialized supervisory body at a decentralized level contravened the principle of subsidiarity and the Member States’ procedural and institutional autonomy, and constituted an excessive administrative burden. This chapter explores whether, despite this change, the CJEU is capable of forcing Member States to adopt these structures, mainly to give effectiveness to the EU remedy of ineffectiveness based on illegal direct awards without prior mandatory publication of contract notices in the Official Journal of the EU.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.