Reformation or Deformation of the EU Public Procurement Rules
Show Less

Reformation or Deformation of the EU Public Procurement Rules

Edited by Grith S. Ølykke and Albert Sanchez-Graells

Using an innovative ‘law and political science’ methodology, this timely book carries out a critical assessment of the reform of the EU public procurement rules. It provides a rich account of the policy directions and the spaces for national regulatory decisions in the transposition of the 2014 Public Procurement Package, as well as areas of uncertainty and indications on how to interpret the rules in order to make them operational in practice.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Exclusion and self-cleaning in Article 57: discretion at the expense of clarity and trade?

Sylvia de Mars

Abstract

This chapter discusses the rules on exclusion of economic operators, as articulated in Article 57 of the 2014 Directive. In particular, it focuses on the aspects of the exclusion rules (relating to grounds for discretionary exclusion, self-cleaning and time limits for exclusion) that grant significant discretion to Member States. Article 57 is the product of significant negotiations between the Council and Parliament on a very scant Commission proposal to grant greater discretion to contracting authorities when both excluding and including economic operators. The chapter shows that the final wording of Article 57 represents a victory for the Council; however, its victory may prove hollow in light of the CJEU’s interpretation of Article 57, which may be narrow so as to prevent contracting authorities’ exercise of these new discretionary powers from limiting inter-state trade. The chapter concludes by recommending that further guidance than is available in the 2014 Directive’s recitals is made available before the CJEU is asked to interpret Article 57; the alternative may be a Court interpretation of Article 57 of the 2014 Directive that more closely resembles the Commission’s limited original 2011 Proposal.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.