The EU Design Approach
Show Less

The EU Design Approach

A Global Appraisal

Edited by Annette Kur, Marianne Levin and Jens Schovsbo

The EU’s ‘Design Approach’ represented a unique attempt to protect industrial design and designers in and on their own terms. It has now been in place for more than a decade and this book, including contributions from leading international scholars, takes stock and attempts to find out what became of the Design Approach: Is it still observed; what has it achieved; how does it interact with other areas of the law; what became of the spare parts problem and how did the world respond to it?
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Greeted with a shrug: the impact of the Community Design System on United States law

Stacey Dogan

Abstract

In an era of increased harmonization of intellectual property laws worldwide, the United States’ treatment of product design looks like an anomaly. Since the European Community Design System went into effect in 2002, advocates in the United States have urged Congress to follow suit and adopt sui generis design protection, particularly for fashion. The US Congress, however, has resisted the call and left design protection to the existing standards of trademark, copyright, and design patent law. This chapter explores some of the reasons that the Community Design System has had so little purchase in US debates over design. The rejection of design rights has resulted from both substantive and pragmatic concerns. The substantive concerns include the utilitarian tradition of US intellectual property law, with its ostensible preference for competition over exclusivity; as a practical matter, definitional problems, enforcement concerns, and political economy considerations have also played a role. The absence of sui generis design protection does not, however, mean an absence of legal protection for design. Despite its practical and theoretical hurdles, there is broad intuitive appeal to the notion that creative designers deserve some form of protection against copying. At times, this has led courts to find outlets for design protection under copyright and trademark/unfair competition law. Design patent law, moreover, which saw little action through the twentieth century, has recently emerged as a popular form of protection for certain types of design. These developments have reduced the perceived urgency of the call for sui generis rights; together with the philosophical and practical concerns discussed above, they help to explain why the calls for a US version of the Community Design System have gone unanswered.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.