Edited by Frank Fagan and Saul Levmore
Chapter 11: Janus-faced law: A philosophical debate
Should law look backward toward time-honored traditions, or forward toward the promotion of social welfare? In this chapter I study the debate between Burkean traditionalists (along with their legal allies) and the British Utilitarians, who find in tradition not wisdom but irrationality and exclusion, and who propose to remodel law along lines of scientific rationality, counting each person equally and promoting aggregate welfare. I examine the strongest arguments for each side and propose a compromise. Keywords: common law, Utilitarianism, Burke, Bentham, Mill, Sidgwick, Holmes, Cardozo
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.