The Legal Challenges of Social Media
Show Less

The Legal Challenges of Social Media

Edited by David Mangan and Lorna E. Gillies

Social media enables instant access to individual self-expression and the sharing of information. Social media issues are boundless, permeating distinct legal disciplines. The law has struggled to adapt and for good reason: how does the law regulate this medium over the public/private law divide? This book engages with the legal implications of social media from public and private law perspectives and outlines how the law, in various legal sub-disciplines and with varying success, has endeavoured to adapt existing tools to social media.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: An unwholesome layer cake: intermediary liability in English defamation and data protection law

Andrew Scott

Abstract

Whether online intermediaries should be liable in respect of defamatory material authored by others has become a pressing issue in jurisdictions around the world. In English law, analogies with traditional publishing contexts have seen liability extended through an expansionist conception of ‘publication’. While this tendency proffers easy access to redress for those aggrieved by online publication, it carries with it potentially profound impacts on free speech and the socio-political potential of the internet. Intermediaries have been induced to act as censors, taking down content irrespective of its accuracy or importance. In response, courts and policy makers have been forced to devise a complicated array of mitigating defences and jurisdictional exclusions for intermediaries. This process can be seen as the haphazard crafting of an unwholesome legal layer cake. The complexity of the area has been exacerbated by the advent of data protection law that is applicable to the same questions. This chapter suggests that the expansion of the concept of publication beyond primary authors, editors and publishers has been a profound misstep in the development of the law. Absent a broad conception of publication, defamation law might easily offer alternative means by which aggrieved parties could secure adequate redress. The alternative means proposed would not extend liability to intermediaries and therefore would not place such persons in the role of censor. Moreover, the existing regime may already have become superfluous in the context of the expanding remit of data protection law. Effective rules in the defamation context, however, might avoid the field being ceded entirely to this new legal technology which currently offers only blunt and inadequate means of balancing the individual and social interests in reputation and free speech. Keywords: defamation; data protection; intermediaries; freedom of speech; reputation; internet

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.