Edited by Shirley V. Scott and Charlotte Ku
Chapter 10: Contested legitimacy: The UN Security Council and climate change
In this chapter, we analyze the two open debates on climate change in the United Nations Security Council of 2007 and 2011 and show that the legitimacy of the Council addressing climate change is contested. Only a slight majority of all evaluative statements on the Council’s authority to address climate change are positive, while nearly as many are negative. When states ascribe legitimacy to the Security Council addressing climate change they primarily refer to the Council’s mandate, but also to the Council’s expertise in this matter and its authority derived from previous Council and General Assembly resolutions. States that deny Security Council legitimacy when it comes to dealing with climate change primarily hold that the Council’s mandate does not cover climate change, but also that the Council lacks expertise and representative decision-making rules. Based on these findings, we suggest that the Council, if it does address climate change, should opt, at least for the moment, for a modest approach, focusing on consent-based and comparably unintrusive measures.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.