Edited by David Landau and Hanna Lerner
Chapter 8: Constitutional design deferred
Constitution makers often leave key issues undecided, or choose to defer certain issues for future resolution. This chapter examines this practice of constitutional ‘deferral’, and its different variants in constitution-making processes worldwide – including in the form of abstract (rather than specific) constitutional language, express by-law clauses and conflicting constitutional provisions. It considers how deferral of this kind can help address both ‘decision’ and ‘error’ costs in processes of constitution-making, but also raise its own dangers of long-term delay or ‘burdens of inertia’ in constitutional implementation. Finally, it considers what if any solutions there may be to this problem of recursive constitutional referral, including the idea of time-frames for deferred action, and judicial enforcement of legislative duties of constitutional implementation.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.