Comparative Constitution Making
Show Less

Comparative Constitution Making

Edited by David Landau and Hanna Lerner

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of new research on constitution making. Comparative Constitution Making provides an up-to-date overview of this rapidly expanding field.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Constitution making and state building

Joanne Wallis

Abstract

Reflecting on the contrary experiences of Timor-Leste and Bougainville, an autonomous region of Papua New Guinea (PNG), this chapter considers the role that constitution making can play in building new states. It begins by outlining the role that constitution making can play in state-building. It then synthesizes the literature on deliberation, discursive participation and public participation in constitution making to demonstrate the importance of public participation in constitution-making and addresses skepticism about its role. To provide context for the empirical comparison it then outlines the background to constitution-making and state-building in Timor-Leste and Bougainville, and analyses the role that public participation in constitution making has played in state-building in the two cases. Based on this comparison, this chapter concludes by arguing that constitution making can play a positive role in state-building, although this will depend upon the level of public participation involved. Participation can be measured along a continuum. At one extreme, participation is minimal and the constitution is made by local elites or imposed by an external force, or there are opportunities for participation but the outcomes have little impact on the resulting constitution. In these circumstances, the Timor-Leste case illustrates that this is unlikely to play a positive role. At the other extreme, there is extensive public participation, in which there is widespread public consultation and genuine opportunities for their feedback to shape the future constitution. The Bougainville case suggests that this is likely to play a positive role. Therefore, the higher the level of public participation in constitution making, the more likely it will play a positive role in state-building, by fostering a sense of political community and by producing a constitution that enhances the legitimacy and effectiveness of state institutions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.