Comparative Constitution Making
Show Less

Comparative Constitution Making

Edited by David Landau and Hanna Lerner

Recent years have witnessed an explosion of new research on constitution making. Comparative Constitution Making provides an up-to-date overview of this rapidly expanding field.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: The making of “illiberal constitutionalism” with or without a new constitution: the case of Hungary and Poland

Gábor Halmai

Abstract

The chapter deals with recent deviations from the shared values of constitutionalism towards a kind of ‘illiberal constitutionalism’ introduced either through a brand-new constitution, as is the case in Hungary since 2010, or through legislative changes that ignore the valid liberal constitution, as is the case in Poland since 2015. Both in Hungary and Poland, the system of governance became populist, illiberal and undemocratic. The backsliding has happened through the use of ‘abusive constitutional’ tools: constitutional amendments and even replacements, because both the internal and the external democratic defence mechanisms against the abuse of constitutional tools failed. The internal ones (constitutional courts, judiciary) failed because the new regimes managed to abolish all checks on their power, and the international ones, such as the EU toolkits, mostly due to the lack of a joint political will to use them. In this populist, illiberal system, the institutions of a constitutional state (the constitutional court, ombudsman, judicial or media councils) still exist, but their power is very limited. Also, as in many illiberal regimes, fundamental rights are listed in the constitutions, but the institutional guarantees of these rights are endangered through the lack of an independent judiciary and constitutional court. The chapter explores the elitist nature of the constitution-making process as one possible reason for the backsliding of liberal constitutionalism, but finally concludes that the lack of constitutional culture during the democratic transition made the use of more participatory constitutionalism very difficult to achieve.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.