Research Handbook on EU Tort Law
Show Less

Research Handbook on EU Tort Law

Edited by Paula Giliker

The Research Handbook on EU Tort Law focuses on the study of the law of tort/delict/non-contractual liability of the European Union and examines the institutional liability of the EU, Francovich liability, and liability arising from a variety of EU secondary legislation (directives/regulations). The impact of EU tort law on national legal systems is wide-ranging, covering areas such as consumer law, competition law, data protection law, employment law, insurance law and financial services law. It also discusses the potential development of a European culture of tort law and harmonisation. This comprehensive Research Handbook contains contributions from leading authors in their field, representing a cross-section of European jurisdictions. It offers an authoritative reference point for academics, students and practitioners studying or working in this field, but one which is also accessible for those approaching the subject for the first time.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: remedying economic torts?

Christine Riefa and Séverine Saintier

Abstract

Directive 2005/29 provides a blanket ban on unfair commercial practices, which harm consumers’ economic interests. The Directive is said to give a pan-European floor to remedying economic torts and yet, the text itself does not make any reference to being a ‘tort instrument’. The absence of the notion of ‘tort’ in the Directive is surprising given the fact that it requires member states to offer ‘tort’-like remedies, including interim as well as final injunctions for the cessation or prevention of unfair commercial practices. In addition, the scope of the Directive explicitly covers unfair practices ‘before, during and after a commercial transaction’ thus encompassing situations where no contractual link will exist and falling necessarily into the remit of tort law. The absence of any mention of tort undoubtedly brings some ambiguity that the national legal orders have had to grapple with. It is therefore not unexpected that the technical choices member states made in order to implement the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) vary greatly. The question of the impact of the UCPD on the common law system of torts is particularly important, given the limits of tort as a tool to address economic loss, and is the focus of this chapter. The UK has opted for a stand-alone piece of legislation, with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (UTR) amended by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Regulations 2014 which introduces a right of private action. This chapter contends that the introduction of the UTRs in 2008 and their amendment in 2014 is a vast improvement of the protection of consumers, although it is clearly still a work in progress. After reflecting on the inadequacy of traditional torts in remedying economic loss, the chapter demonstrates that in the UK, the UCPD supplants the old traditional barriers and there is no longer a need to decide if a claim is in tort or contract, offering consumers a much easier avenue for redress. Nevertheless it remains doubtful that consumers’ economic losses are going to be adequately compensated, given the limitations of the right of private redress introduced in 2014.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.