Handbook on Hybrid Organisations
Show Less

Handbook on Hybrid Organisations

Edited by David Billis and Colin Rochester

Hybrid Organisations – that integrate competing organisational principles – have become a preferred means of tackling the complexity of today's societal problems. One familiar set of examples are organisations that combine significant features from market, public and third sector organisations. Many different groundbreaking approaches to hybridity are contained in this Handbook, which brings together a collection of empirical studies from an international body of scholars. The chapters analyse and theorise the position of hybrid organisations and have important implications for theory, practice and policy in a context of proliferating hybrid forms of organisation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 18: Public administration regimes and co-production in hybrid organisations

Victor Pestoff

Abstract

This chapter analyses the impact of public administration regimes (PARs) and coproduction on hybrid organisations. The study of both PARs and co-production is a relatively new academic phenomenon, so there is still little systematic knowledge on how they impact on hybridity, and in particular how they impact on third sector organisations (TSOs). Yet, TSOs often work closely with public sector organisations, sometimes in partnership, so important changes in the way the public sector works have clear implications for TSOs and other hybrid organisations. For example, a major shift in the function and operation of traditional public administration occurred in the early 1980s that had clear and far-reaching ramifications for both the private and the third sectors. The growth and spread of a market ideology in the management of public services that later became known as New Public Management (NPM) brought with it a new focus and mode of operating, particularly in relation to the private and third sector providers of public services. So, it is impossible to ignore such sweeping changes in the public sector when considering hybridity and the third sector. Therefore, the purpose of this chapter is to clarify the impact of public administration regimes and co-production on hybridity, in particular in the third sector. This will be achieved in part by comparing and contrasting the values and goals of four PARs, with a focus on the role played by service users and professionals in the provision of publicly financed social services. The development of new PARs, such as New Public Management, contributes significantly to the complexity and hybridity facing the leaders of third sector providers of publicly financed services. The concept of co-production furthers the study with its focus on the mix of activities that both public agents and citizens contribute to the provision of public services. It also adds to the complexity and hybridity facing the leaders of third sector providers of publicly financed services. How these two concepts interact with each other and with hybridity are also explored in the following pages.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.