Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness
Edited by Wim van Oorschot, Femke Roosma, Bart Meuleman and Tim Reeskens
Chapter 3: The Relative Importance of Welfare Deservingness Criteria
The reason why particular target groups are perceived by the general public as more deserving of welfare provision than other groups can often be understood from how people apply the five CARIN deservingness criteria. For instance, as explained in Chapter 1 of this volume, using the CARIN criteria, we can explain why the general public usually perceives the elderly as the most deserving of welfare support, whereas immigrants are regarded as the most undeserving group. In literature about welfare deservingness – with reference to the criteria – a ‘universal’ rank order of deservingness is suggested to exist, however, as shown in Chapter 2 in this volume, this idea may be subject to criticism. Apart from the issue of the rank order of deservingness, another important question that has not been addressed in detail in the literature to date concerns whether each of the five CARIN criteria plays an equal role in people’s deservingness opinions, or whether in some circumstances, some criteria carry more weight than others.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.