The Role of the European Ombudsman
Edited by Herwig C.H. Hofmann and Jacques Ziller
Chapter 6: Discretion and law in the EU administration: where the courts do not enter
Recent high profile judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ESMA and Gauweiler) have endorsed the expansion of the EU’s executive powers, including of its administration. Once such powers are attributed or judicially endorsed, how far may law reach in structuring the exercise of discretion by EU administrative actors? The chapter analyses the way the EU Courts have reviewed administrative discretion in instances where they have performed a close scrutiny thereof. It argues that such review downplays the role law ought to have in structuring the exercise of administrative discretion, by overlooking the public interests that ought to be pursued by force of legal norms. By contrast, the control of discretion by the European Ombudsman illustrates a different and normatively more demanding understanding of how law may operate in relation to discretion.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.