Abuse of Dominance in EU Competition Law
Show Less

Abuse of Dominance in EU Competition Law

Emerging Trends

Edited by Pier L. Parcu, Giorgio Monti and Marco Botta

Granting rebates to a customer or refusing to supply a competitor are examples of ordinary commercial practices, which become ‘abusive’ under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) when carried out by ‘dominant’ firms. This topical book provides an up-to-date account of the emerging trends in the enforcement and interpretation of this provision at both the EU and national level.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Standard-essential patents and abusive patent injunctions – the interplay between German courts and the CJEU

Heike Schweitzer


In many industries, technical standards established within the framework of standard-setting organizations (SSOs) play an important role, as they ensure the interoperability of products and services. Under the normal SSOs’ rules, the holder of patents essential to the standard selected (so-called standard-essential patents, SEPs) must commit to license its SEPs to any interested third party under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms and conditions. Yet, no consensus exists on what FRAND terms are or how to determine them. Rather, the determination of the licensing terms is left to the negotiations between the SEP holders and the potential licensees. Not infrequently, negotiations break down. As the potential licensee will normally depend on the possibility to make use of the patented innovation, the question has arisen whether the SEP holder can impede the use of their patent by requesting a court injunction against the breach of patent in such cases, or whether and when a request for an injunction will constitute an abuse of a dominant position. The threat of an injunction will greatly increase the patent holder’s bargaining power. Where such an injunction is not possible, the bargaining power of the potential licensee will increase. The chapter aims to analyse the standard of assessment of patent injunctions under Article 102 TFEU in the light of the CJEU ruling in Huawei (Case C-170/13). It analyses the judgment with reference to the related German jurisprudence (namely Orange Book), in order to assess whether German standards will need to be adjusted. The positions adopted in other jurisdictions are also taken into account. Keywords: SEP; SSO; Huawei; FRAND; German courts; Orange Book

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.