Public Policy Transfer
Show Less

Public Policy Transfer

Micro-Dynamics and Macro-Effects

Edited by Magdaléna Hadjiisky, Leslie A. Pal and Christopher Walker

Contemporary policy making is deeply influenced by the borrowing, transfer and diffusion of ideas and models from other countries, levels of government and supranational institutions. This is the first book to analyze comparatively the micro-dynamics of transfer across regions, contrasting policy fields, multiple levels of governance, and institutional actors. Grounded in original research by specialists in the field, it provides fresh and arresting insights into competition among transfer agents, resistances, local coalitions, translation, and policy learning. This empirical depth informs a reinvigorated and nuanced theoretical framework on global policy transfer processes.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Rule of law promotion: US and EU experiences in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Ukraine

Ramona Coman


This chapter scrutinizes the rule of law promotion in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ukraine. Policy transfer agents are American, international and European institutions whose bureaucrats or elected representatives define and prescribe norms and standards, monitor and supervise the implementation of judicial reforms, provide financial support for drafting legislation and national strategies, and ultimately help domestic actors to enhance the rule of law at the domestic level. The chapter shows that rule of law promotion is a dynamic field where the USAID, the EU, the CoE, the OSCE and the OECD contribute to a large extent to the diffusion of core ideas on how to strengthen the rule of law in countries in transition. Over the last decades, their cooperation has led to increased policy convergence in their approaches. However, in recent years, these IOs have been challenged both from below and from within to consider negative lessons and to develop new programs with a focus on ownership and domestic specificities. Knowledge gained from past experiences and a series of negative lessons on the ground (policy learning), backed by strong criticism emanating from beneficiary countries and experts themselves, have led both American and European actors to consider a possible redefinition of their rule of law approaches and to try to improve their cooperation on the ground (policy coordination). The chapter shows that both American and European actors seek to increase domestic ownership and claim to put in place tailor-made solutions for reform in order to consider the domestic situation and the judicial tradition of the country concerned. Keywords: rule of law, judicial reform, policy convergence, policy, European Union, European Commission, Council for Europe, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.