Edited by Monica den Boer
Chapter 21: Police leadership: a comparative consideration of legislative imperatives in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States
Global police leadership is a complex business. Comparing police leadership in three jurisdictions, namely Australia, Canada and the United States, the authors observe that despite common roots and similarities, decades of independent evolution have resulted in unique police leadership imperatives. Each nation has a policing system has experienced its own evolutionary trajectory, grounded in unique social expectations and political controls. The analysis shows that each country has a different relationship to its stakeholders, community, government, and workforce, as well as a different approach to the management, administration, and leadership of police organizations and personnel. Within each system of policing, specific responses are required to ensure leadership development and sufficient leader and organizational accountability. The three policing systems can do more to increase accountability through formal mandates and government control. While lessons can be learnt from another, the policing systems face challenges in finding the balance between organizational autonomy and organizational accountability.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.