Edited by Rosalind Dixon and Tom Ginsburg
Chapter 13: The institutional limits of Inter-American constitutionalism
This chapter discusses the emergence of Inter-American constitutionalism by addressing two related questions. First, how has the Inter-American Court, despite its significant institutional constraints, come to be perceived as an entity that is forging a new American constitutional order by reshaping the content and practice of constitutional law in the region? Second, at what point will the Court have gone too far, such that we should worry about its incursion on the turf of domestic institutions, including but not limited to constitutional courts? By addressing these two puzzles – one empirical and one normative – the chapter aspires to put the emerging field of empirical studies of the Inter-American Court in closer dialogue with debates among legal scholars over the proper level of deference the Inter-American Court should exhibit. Keywords: Inter-American Court, Inter-American Constitutionalism, conventionality control, judicial dialogue, structural remedies, constitutional block
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.