Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education
Show Less

Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education

Edited by Ellen Hazelkorn, Hamish Coates and Alexander C. McCormick

As higher education becomes a key determinant for economic competitiveness, institutions face increasing pressure to demonstrate their fitness to meet the needs of society and individuals. Blending innovative research with richly contextualised examples this unique Research Handbook provides authoritative insights from around the globe on how best to understand, assess and improve quality, performance and accountability in higher education.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Comparing and benchmarking higher education systems

Ross Williams

Abstract

A quality higher education system meets national and personal needs and underpins economic growth. A quality system must therefore comprise diverse institutions. A nation’s higher education system should not be judged solely on the output of its research-intensive universities. International comparisons highlight the strengths and weaknesses of national systems. Nevertheless, benchmarking must be done judiciously. The ‘best’ national system for a country will differ according to its stage of economic development, political structure, natural resources and population size. Comparisons are best made like-for-like. This chapter categorises the various functions performed by tertiary institutions: research, teaching and scholarship are cross-classified by whether they are internal activities or involve external engagement. The associated performance measures and data requirements are discussed. Some empirical results for selected outcomes are presented for 50 countries; the need to control for a country’s income level is emphasised. Outcomes are matched with determinants, especially types of funding. No clearly preferred model emerges, although research performance can be improved relatively quickly by targeted government funding. The split between private and public expenditure and between private and public institutions is not important so long as the structure is accompanied by policies that ensure appropriate total funding and promote competition between institutions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.