Edited by Ellen Hazelkorn, Hamish Coates and Alexander C. McCormick
Chapter 32: Higher education policy in the Philippines: quality and quality assurance for socioeconomic development?
Can quality assurance policies in higher education promote socioeconomic development? This assumption underpins government policy in the Philippines, as it does in many other countries. In the Philippines, we show the problems that have arisen in how quality has been conceptualised by government and how it has been enacted in practice. We discuss the role the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), the statutory body that oversees higher education institutions, plays in higher education accountability; review the processes and mechanisms for implementing quality assurance policies; and evaluate the country’s systems of accreditation. Quantitatively, a total of 206 higher education administrators in seven recognized colleges and four universities were randomly sampled and analysed. A multiple regression coefficient was used to determine the predictor of performance in higher education. We find that the relationship between higher education policy and development is mediated by the meanings ascribed to quality and quality assurance, and the realities in which policies are implemented.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.