Edited by Matthew Harding
Chapter 16: Public benefit post-Pemsel
This chapter considers the public benefit test that is a central feature of charity law. It argues that common law jurisdictions once held a shared view about the role of the public benefit requirement. It then outlines the various ways in which that consensus has been fragmented and lost because of legislative and other reforms in different parts of the world. In particular there has been considerable divergence in relation to the requirement, and practice, of ‘presuming’ or ‘assuming’ the public benefit of purposes of one or another type, and this divergence has generated much confusion and controversy. The chapter raises the question: does charity law need a public benefit requirement at all, or could all the work of such a requirement be done more clearly and efficiently by the ‘heads’ of charity coupled with precise and targeted disqualifying rules?
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.