Edited by Matthew Harding
Chapter 21: Reforming tax policy with respect to nonprofit organizations
This chapter considers the tax treatment of not-for-profit organizations in the United States of Australia, which are a product of federalism, constitutional commitments, legislative complexity and political culture. The chapter considers the implications of the notorious decision of the United States Supreme Court in Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, which has allowed tax exempt funds to be applied for political campaigning purposes via not-for-profit vehicles that are not subject to disclosure laws. It also addresses some of the ways in which the Inland Revenue Service functions as a de facto regulator of the not-for-profit sector in the US notwithstanding its mandate to collect and preserve the revenue. The chapter concludes by emphasizing that in the US the goals of not-for-profit law and regulation risk becoming ‘collateral damage’ in broader tax reforms.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.