Edited by Marc Hertogh and Richard Kirkham
Chapter 8: The European Ombudsman and the Court of Justice of the EuropeanUnion: competition or symbiosis in promoting transparency?
Ombudsmen and the judiciary are two different institutions with two different sets of competences and remits. Although they have some clearly different competences, there might be a grey area where their remits come together and potentially overlap i.e., an area where ombudsmen and the judiciary alike provide protection to individuals by assessing their complaints or by dealing with their legal actions. The possible overlap between the competences of these institutions can give the impression that there is some competition between the two or that the ombudsmen assume a position that does not really belong to them. This chapter first, aims to provide a short general overview of the most striking competence-based differences and similarities between ombudsmen and the judiciary and second, to illustrate the overlaps it discusses the specific relations between the European Ombudsman and the Court of Justice of the European Union.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.