Social Policy in the Middle East and North Africa
Show Less

Social Policy in the Middle East and North Africa

The New Social Protection Paradigm and Universal Coverage

Edited by Rana Jawad, Nicola Jones and Mahmood Messkoub

This book presents a state of the art in the developing field of social policy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. It offers an up-to-date conceptual analysis of social policy programmes and discourses in the MENA region by critically reviewing the range of social insurance and social assistance schemes that are currently in existence there. It also analyses and offers suggestions on which of these policies can positively impact the region’s advancement in terms of human development and in addressing social and economic inequalities and exclusion.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Social protection schemes in the Middle East and North Africa: not fair, not efficient, not effective

Markus Loewe


Social protection systems have a triple function in the development process: a socio-economic one (to reduce inequality and poverty in all its dimensions), an economic one (to reduce the vulnerability of households and thereby encourage them to become economically active) and a societal and political one (to strengthen social inclusion, social solidarity social cohesion and the stability of society and polity). Social protection systems in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), however, fail largely with respect to all three functions. Governments in the region spend considerable shares of GDP on social protection but these are typically used for inefficient and inegalitarian instruments. Most public social protection schemes cover only parts of the population or provide different degrees of social security to different population groups, thereby replicating and intensifying the existing stratification of society. As a result, they exclude large parts of society from membership, redistribute resources from the bottom up rather than to the poor and therefore have only limited effects of poverty, inequality, economic investment and growth, social inclusion and social cohesion. At the same time, most schemes also suffer from significant deficits with regards to efficiency and sustainability.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.