Edited by Edmund C. Stazyk and H. G. Frederickson
Chapter 8: Dueling banjos in American public administration: the enduring themes of accountability and performance
American public administration became a self-aware academic discipline and field of professional practice during the Progressive Era. The politics–administration dichotomy provided the intellectual rationale for this transformation, but it was subsequently debunked, causing grave concerns about the accountability and performance of public administrators because they are appointed rather than elected officials with lifetime tenure. This chapter explores the tense relationship between bureaucratic accountability and performance in American public administration, focusing on how these concerns emerged during the Progressive Era and why they continue to dominate the study and practice of public administration today. Efforts to resolve these concerns are summarized and critiqued. Finally, the chapter concludes that the pursuit of accountability and performance will likely shape the future of American public administration_even as the administrative state shrinks and shared governance proliferates. Public administration scholars and practitioners will thus need to continue searching for ways to satisfy these howling demands.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.