Edited by Gareth Davies and Matej Avbelj
Chapter 9: Triangular constitutionalism: some consequences of constitutional pluralism for domestic constitutional thought
Though constitutional pluralism has become well established as a way of thinking about EU constitutional law, its lessons have yet to be properly internalised in national constitutional discourse. The aim of the ‘triangular constitutionalism’ outlined here is threefold. The first aim is to wean national constitutional thought off the solipsism that imagines that national constitutions can be thought of and engaged with in isolation, cut off from the European legal orders. The second is to provide a theoretically sound framework for the application of constitutional pluralist thought within a given legal order, rather than from an unmoored and freestanding epistemic perspective. The third and final is to offer an account of the interactions between legal orders in Europe that does not depend only on isolated cases of conflict between powerful actors (though these can be important), but also on the daily workings of constitutionalism, at the periphery as much as at the centre.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.