Edited by Gareth Davies and Matej Avbelj
Chapter 22: The dangers of constitutional pluralism
This article rejects the normative claim made by constitutional pluralists that it is desirable to leave questions of ultimate legal authority open and unsettled in the EU context. Not only is the concept of constitutional pluralism logically and practically untenable, it also presents grave dangers to the survival of the EU's judicial order. Though advocates of constitutional pluralism had the best of intentions, their support for this dangerous idea has had damaging effects. Initially developed by sincere academics and championed by the highly respected German Federal Constitutional Court, this dangerous idea has now fallen into the hands of legal miscreants, such as courts controlled by increasingly autocratic member state governments in Hungary and Poland. This opens the way for more challenges to the supremacy of EU law and the CJEU's role in interpreting it. Rather than serving as a basis for constructive judicial dialogue, the concept of constitutional pluralism presents a clear and present danger to the EU legal order.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.