Comparative Capital Punishment
Show Less

Comparative Capital Punishment

Edited by Carol S. Steiker and Jordan M. Steiker

Comparative Capital Punishment offers a set of in-depth, critical and comparative contributions addressing death practices around the world. Despite the dramatic decline of the death penalty in the last half of the twentieth century, capital punishment remains in force in a substantial number of countries around the globe. This research handbook explores both the forces behind the stunning recent rejection of the death penalty, as well as the changing shape of capital practices where it is retained. The expert contributors address the social, political, economic, and cultural influences on both retention and abolition of the death penalty and consider the distinctive possibilities and pathways to worldwide abolition.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Extradition and non-refoulement

Bharat Malkani


This chapter charts the development of the law that applies when a state is requested by another state to extradite an individual in actual or potential death penalty cases. It is generally accepted now that international law demands abolitionist states to seek and obtain assurances that the death penalty will not be imposed or carried out, before extraditing a person. Similarly, retentionist states must seek assurances that the death penalty will only be applied in line with standards of international human rights law before extraditing a person. While these rules are generally agreed upon, the principles that underpin these rules have received little attention. These principles warrant exploration, though, since they have implications beyond the field of extradition. Two such principles are identified: (i) the jurisdictional principle, which prohibits states from subjecting individuals in their jurisdiction to punishments that have been outlawed; and (ii) the principle of non-complicity, which prohibits states from being complicit in punishments that it has outlawed. With this in mind, it is argued that the legal framework in extradition cases should be extended to mutual legal assistance and other cases of complicity with capital punishment, such as the provision of intelligence, resources and evidence in actual or potential death penalty cases.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.