Edited by Stephen Elstub and Oliver Escobar
Chapter 11: The impact of democratic innovations on citizens’ efficacy
When we look at the subfield that analyses the impact of democratic innovations on efficacy, we find that most of the existing empirical knowledge focuses on the study of a single case study, treats democratic innovations as a black box, and has difficulties bridging the gap between pilots and institutions. Not surprisingly, this body of empirical knowledge offers inconclusive results. This chapter begins by reviewing literatures in political science, pedagogy and psychology that might shed light on the impact of democratic innovations on efficacy and then, by leveraging the flexibility of the systemic approach, sketches a research agenda designed to overcome the limits of the subfield. The chapter showcases this approach by comparing the subsystems of two extremely different democratic innovations, Deliberative Polling and Participatory Budgeting, and generating a set of new testable hypotheses on the impact of such subsystems on efficacy.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.