Edited by Stephen Elstub and Oliver Escobar
Chapter 37: Comparative approaches to the study of democratic innovation
The chapter aims to explain why comparative approaches to Democratic Innovations (DI) are important. I argue that DI scholarship needs to be aware of best practices and methodological developments in comparative political science, and that there are risks to particularising the study of democratic innovation. DI scholarship has sometimes struggled to negotiate the tension between its normative democratising project and the empirical work aimed at understanding democratic participation in practice. More comparison is a good answer to this problem. I trace developments of comparison in DI research using examples that compare both small and large numbers of cases. I argue that the conceptual haziness of DI has led scholars to favour case-studies or individual-level behavioural data (participant surveys or quasi-experiments) for comparison. Some opportunities for comparison are being missed. I suggest that now is time to mainstream systematic comparison in the study of DI.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.