Legal Responses to Transnational and International Crimes
Show Less

Legal Responses to Transnational and International Crimes

Towards an Integrative Approach

Edited by Harmen Van der Wilt and Christophe Paulussen

This book critically reflects on the relationship between ‘core crimes’ which make up the subject matter jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression) and transnational crimes. The contributions in the book address the features of several transnational crimes and generally acknowledge that the boundaries between core crimes and transnational crimes are blurring. One of the major questions is whether, in view of this gradual merger of the categories, the distinction in legal regime is still warranted. Should prosecution and trial of transnational crimes be transferred from national to international jurisdictions?
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Privatisation and increasing complexity of mass violence in Mexico and Central America: exploring appropriate international responses

Sander Wirken and Hanna Bosdriesz

Abstract

Mass violence in Mexico and Central America has undergone a process of privatisation and decentralisation over the past decades. States have lost their predominant position in the panorama of violence while a very wide range of non-state actors has risen. Although certain state actors in the region do commit serious human rights violations, they do equally grave damage by their omission to stop the various violent criminal actors active on their territories. In this contribution we analyse the role international law and international institutions can play in Mexico and Central America. In our view, the international criminal law framework provided by the Rome Statute is of limited relevance to the situation. Although certain crimes committed in the region may be qualified as crimes against humanity, the international criminal law framework was not designed for this kind of decentralised violence panorama. Moreover, institutionally the ICC is ill-equipped to intervene in this situation. Rather than merely being punished for the commission of crimes or for complicity therein, the states in the region should be encouraged to take more effective action against the escalation of privately organised violence on their territories. To that end, the Inter-American human rights system provides a normative framework that includes both states’ positive obligations to investigate and prosecute serious human rights violations occurring on their territory, as well as their negative obligations in terms of abstaining from practices like torture, arbitrary detention, or extra-judicial executions. Institutionally, the hybrid and innovative intervention of the CICIG (the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala) has shown remarkable effectiveness in improving the performance of the Guatemalan justice system. We argue that the centrepiece for the international (legal) community in addressing the situation in Mexico and Central America should be the Inter-American system and CICIG-like interventions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.