Non-Conventional Copyright
Show Less

Non-Conventional Copyright

Do New and Atypical Works Deserve Protection?

Edited by Enrico Bonadio and Nicola Lucchi

This book draws a picture of possible new spaces for copyright. It expands on whether modern copyright law should be more flexible as to whether new or unconventional forms of expression - including graffiti, tattoos, land art, conceptual art and bio art, engineered DNA, sport movements, jokes, magic tricks, dj-sets, 3D printing, works generated by artificial intelligence, perfume making, typefaces, illegal and immoral works - deserve protection. The contributors offer authoritative, coherent and well-argued essays focusing on whether copyright can subsist in these unconventional subject matters.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Music improvisation and copyright

Giuseppe Mazziotti

Abstract

The recording of Keith Jarrett’s ‘Köln Concert’ album in 1975 is a prominent example of how a performing art such as music can allow skilled artists to create original and highly regarded compositions without having to rely on fixed musical materials or texts. The chapter explains why copyright systems have ended up disfavouring extemporaneous authorship, in spite of an international legal framework that is strongly protective of authors’ rights. It is mainly for historical reasons that the notion of musical ‘work’ ended up being defined on the sole grounds of notation, with the progressive extension of the copyright protection originally conceived for books and other literary works to musical writings, fixations and sound recordings. The chapter relies on examples of music works and sound recordings to show that improvisers can acquire an unconventional type of copyright – consisting of exclusive or remuneration rights granted to authors and performers of the music they play – on condition that their improvised pieces are original and, in certain jurisdictions, fixed in a tangible medium. However, as things stand, copyright law is more of an obstacle than a source of economic incentives and reward for musicians. Taking jazz music as an example of appropriation art based on transformative use of ‘standards’ embodied in collections such as the ‘Real Book’ and the ‘American Songbook’, the chapter critically evaluates – from a comparative perspective – the impact of copyright in pre-existing works on the freedom of improvisers to quote, elaborate and transform such works and to be credited and earn remuneration for their creative contributions. While considering the pros and cons of implementing copyright paradigms in the realm of music improvisation, the chapter concludes that a broader understanding of musical authorship, which also encompasses performative aspects of composition, and a higher consideration for autonomy and originality of improvised music based on pre-existing works would ensure a more adequate incentive and reward of creativity relying on improvisation techniques.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.