Do New and Atypical Works Deserve Protection?
Edited by Enrico Bonadio and Nicola Lucchi
The chapter explores whether pornographic works – intended as creative works consisting of the depiction of women and/or men as sexual beings – can be protected by copyright. After commenting on cases from various jurisdictions, including the US, the UK and France, the authors discuss the critical arguments made both in support and against copyright protection for this controversial subject matter (which is considered by many as morally unacceptable). The chapter concludes that the overriding need to protect free speech makes the argument supporting the copyrightability of this category of works more persuasive and convincing.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.