Edited by Sean Griffith, Jessica Erickson, David H. Webber and Verity Winship
Chapter 12: Disclosure settlements in the state courts post-Trulia: practicalconsiderations
This chapter takes a close look at shareholder class actions following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 opinion in In re Trulia, Inc. subjecting disclosure settlements to heightened judicial scrutiny. Although Trulia reduced the number of disclosure settlements in Delaware, plaintiffs have shown continued willingness to present such settlements in courts outside of Delaware, where judges may face substantive and procedural obstacles to applying the same standards. The chapter reports on the considerations facing judges outside of Delaware in evaluating disclosure settlements under Trulia. First, it draws a distinction between the corporate benefit doctrine and the common fund doctrine to shed light on how Trulia may be applied differently in different states. The chapter then discusses the considerations involved when a court is to apply Delaware law or another state’s laws including class action procedures, professional responsibility regarding attorney’s fees, and evidentiary rules in assessing the materiality of disclosures.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.