Edited by Katharyne Mitchell, Reece Jones and Jennifer L. Fluri
Chapter 30: Contradictions and provocations of neoliberal governmentality in the US asylum seeking system
Governmentality and neoliberal governmentality offer productive frameworks in analyses of efforts to control migration and (im)mobility. Recently, scholars have identified the need for more attention to complex and messy articulations of neoliberal governmentality. This chapter takes up this call with a focus on the US asylum seeking adjudication process. The author outlines asylum application and adjudication procedures and then details a system that is replete with bureaucracy and contradiction. Asylum seekers are disciplined yet called upon to be ever more entrepreneurial. Resources are redirected toward securitization, resulting in scarcity, higher caseloads, and longer wait times for asylum case decisions. Heightened demand for unassailable evidence increases the value of expertise yet ‘truth’ in the context of asylum is increasingly delegitimized. This presents several challenges for legal representation and migrant support groups who must calculate the value of and trade-offs in providing expertise and support. The chapter closes with a further call and provocation to engage with the contradictions of the neoliberal governmentality of asylum as a messy yet necessary imperative for critical geographies of migration.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.