The Fragmented Landscape of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe
Show Less

The Fragmented Landscape of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe

The Role of Judicial and Non-Judicial Actors

Edited by Lorenza Violini and Antonia Baraggia

The composite nature of the EU constitutional legal framework, and the presence of different rights protection actors within the European landscape, presents a complex and fragmented framework, still in search of a coherent structure. This discerning book provides a comprehensive perspective on fundamental rights protection in Europe, with engaging contributions considering not only the role of judicial actors but also the increasing relevance of non-judicial bodies, including agencies, national human rights institutions, the Venice Commission and equality bodies.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Fundamental rights protection beyond individual complaints: The potential of national human rights institutions in Europe

Katrien Meuwissen


Human rights are generally conceived as rights inherently pertaining to each individual which need to be respected and protected by states. Human/fundamental rights protection in Europe is accordingly typically examined in light of the avenues that are open to individuals to make human rights claims against state authorities. Across the national democracies in Europe, individuals in the first place have the possibility to initiate human rights related claims against state authorities before the national judiciary which can take legally binding and enforceable decisions. An extra layer of judicial protection for individuals in the area of human rights is provided on the regional level in Europe by the European Court for Human Rights (ECtHR) and – increasingly – the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Especially compared to other regions in the world, the European region thus provides a robust system of judicial protection of individuals’ human rights against the state. In addition to individual complaints-handling by the judiciary, many European countries also have a long and widespread tradition of quasijudicial complaints-handling by ombuds-institutions resulting in nonjudicially binding but more flexible remedies. While ombuds-institutions traditionally merely dealt with governments’ mal-administration, an increasing focus on human rights protection has become apparent in this context too. Quasi-judicial handling of individuals’ human rights complaints carries some risks (such as power imbalances) and will not be appropriate in all circumstances, but it appears an increasingly popular avenue to complement the often overburdened judicial complaintshandling mechanisms on the domestic as well as regional level across European

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.