Handbook of Cultural Security
Show Less

Handbook of Cultural Security

Edited by Yasushi Watanabe

This Handbook aims to heighten our awareness of the unique and delicate interplay between ‘Culture’ and ‘Society’ in the age of globalization. With particular emphasis on the role of culture in the field of “non-traditional” security, and seeking to define what ‘being secure’ means in different contexts, this Handbook explores the emerging concept of cultural security, providing a platform for future debates in both academic and policy fields.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Private gains and social costs of China’s gated communities

Chris Webster, Jingjing Ruan and Guibo Sun

Abstract

Gating in insecure cities is likely to be a response to both real and perceived issues of insecurity. This brings private benefits to gated inhabitants but imposes social costs. A social cost frequently cited by urban planners is the fragmentation of urban form. In this chapter, the authors explore the sense of security as a private benefit of gated compounds and spatial segregation of urban form as a social cost. They review the issue with reference to the published literature and discuss the special case of gating in China. Issues from the discussion are illustrated with maps showing the ubiquity of gated estates in the Chinese city of Nanchang, including legacy gated neighbourhoods from the era of the state-controlled economy and modern gated communities. From a household survey (N = 2404) drawn from a sample of the city’s gated estates, the authors investigate perceived and actual security. They find that modern gated communities managed as residential clubs significantly lower the actual risk of theft and burglary, but that the vast majority of gated community residents believe their estates to be permeable to pedestrians. In another empirical study, they use spatial analysis to measure the degree of actual pedestrian impermeability caused by gates and walls and go on to estimate the social gain achieved by removing the gates. Since residents think that their estates are more permeable than they are, the authors speculate that a degree of ungating, as in a Chinese government recent policy statement, could reduce social costs of spatial partitioning without imposing significant private losses through higher crime risk.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.