Show Less
You do not have access to this content

EU COPYRIGHT LAW

A Commentary

IRINI STAMATOUDI, PAUL TORREMANS

This significantly revised and updated second edition addresses the rapid development of EU copyright law in relation to the advancement of new technologies, the need for a borderless digital market and the considerable number of EU legal instruments enacted as a result. Taking a comparative approach, the Commentary provides comprehensive coverage and in-depth commentary on each of the EU legal instruments and policies, both from an EU and an international perspective. Alongside full legislative analysis and article-by-article commentary, the Commentary illustrates the underlying basic principles of free movement and non-discrimination and provides insights into the influence of copyright on other areas of EU policy, including telecoms and bilateral trade agreements.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

TABLE OF CASES

ACI Adam BV (C-435/12) EU:C:2014:254 11.77, 11.81, 11.115, 11.121, 12.10, 12.208, 28.42

Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA (C-277/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:65 7.12

Airfield NV and Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) (C-431/09 and C-432/09) ECLI:EU:C:2011:157 7.12, 7.14, 11.24, 11.35

AKM (C-138/16) ECLI:EU:C:2017:218 7.10

Akzo Chemie BV v Commission (62/86) [1991] ECR 461 4.14, 4.25

Alessandro Tedesco v Tomasoni Fittings and RWO Marine Equipment (C-175/06) ECLI:EU:C:2007:451 12.104

Almelo v NV Energiebedrif Ijss elmij (C-393/92) [1994] ECR I-1477 4.03

Amazon.com International Sales Inc and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH (C-521/11) [2013] EUECJ 11.119, 14.49

AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees and Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL and Pedro Rodríguez Arribas (C-172/18) ECLI:EU:C:2019:674 24.92

Andreas Grund acting as administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of SR-Tronic GmbH, and Others v Nintendo Co Ltd and Nintendo of America Inc (C-458/13), Order of the Court of 7 May 2014 11.127

Apis-Hristovich EOOD v Lakorda AD (C-545/07) [2009] ECR I-1627 9.46, 9.53

ARD (C-6/98) [1999] ECR I-7599 15.37

Art & Allposters (C-419/13) 11.56

Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi (C-434/15) EU:C:2017:981 17.29, 17.234

AstraZeneca v Commission (C-457/10) EU:C:2012:770 4.13, 4.76

Basset v SACEM (402/85) [1987] ECR I-1747 14.29, 16.76

Bastei Lübbe GmbH & Co KG v Michael Strotzer (C-149/17) ECLI:EU:C:2018:841 12.66, 21.136

Bayer Pharma AG v Richter Gedeon Vegyészeti Gyár Nyrt and Others (C-688/17) ECLI:EU:C:2019:722 12.140

Beecham Group v Andacon NV (C-132/07) ECLI:EU:C:2008:205 10.22, 21.01

Belgische Radio en Televisie (BRT) v SABAM (127/73) [1974] ECR 51 14.27

BelgischeVereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Netlog NV (C-360/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:85 11.172, 11.176, 12.18, 12.26, 12.122, 12.133, 12.181, 17.266, 21.49, 21.57, 21.158, 21.160, 21.162, 28.24

Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt v Plastinnova 2000 Kft (C-180/11) ECLI:EU:C:2012:717 12.10, 12.208

BestWater International GmbH v Michael Mebes, Stefan Potsch (C-348/13) [2014] EUECJ 11.31, 11.33, 11.101

Bezpeĉnostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany (BSA) v Ministerstvo kultury (Softwarová) (C-393/09) see Softwarová

Bolagsupplysningen OÜ and Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB (C-194/16) ECLI:EU:C:2017:766 28.13

Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB, Storyside AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB (C-461/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:219 11.190, 12.26, 12.114, 12.122, 12.127, 21.166

British Airways v Commission (C-95/04 P) [2007] ECR I-2331 4.39

British Horseracing Board (BHB) Ltd and Others v William Hill Organization Ltd (C-203/02) [2004] ECR I-10415 3.11, 9.21, 9.38, 9.45, 9.46, 9.47, 9.52, 9.56, 17.62, 17.67, 17.110, 17.111

Brüstle v Greenpeace (C-34/10) [2011] ECR I-09821 5.79, 11.34, 17.174

Bundesverband der Arzneimittel-Importure eV (BAI) and Commission v Bayer (C-2/01 and 3/01P) [2004] ECR I-23 4.03

Butterfly Music Srl v Carosello Edizioni Musicali e Discografiche Srl (C-60/98) [1999] ECR I-03939 8.71, 8.76

C More Entertainment (C-279/13) ECLI:EU:C:2015:199 11.24, 11.25, 11.31, 11.101, 16.65, 17.236

Calfa (C-348/96) [1999] ECR I-11 15.06

Canon Deutschland GmbH (C-458/11) and Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH (C-459/11) 17.138

Cassina v Peek & Cloppenburg (C-456/06) ECLI:EU:C:2008:232 1.12, 1.13

Centros v Erhvervs-og Selskabsstyrelsen (C-212/97) [1999] ECR I-1459 15.06

Christian Liffers v Producciones Mandarina SL en Mediaset España Comunicación SA (C-99/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:173 12.197, 12.201, 12.203

CILIFT (283/81) [1982] ECR 3415 27.07

Cipolla and Others (C-94/04 and C-202/04) [2006] ECR I-11421 15.37

Circul Globus Bucureşti (Circ & Variete Globus Bucureşti) v Uniunea şi Muzicologilor din România – Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor (UCMR – ADA) (C-238/10) [2011] ECR I-12031 11.25

Coditel v CinéVog Films (C-62/79) [1980] ECR 881 1.05, 1.06, 3.09, 3.10, 11.36, 15.37

Coditel v CinéVog Films II (C-262/81) [1982] ECR 3381 1.06, 11.36

Cofermel v G-Star Raw (C-683/17) ECLI:EU:C:2019:721 1.15, 8.59, 9.13, 29.24

Commercial Solvents v Commission (C-6/73 and 7/73) [1974] ECR 223, [1974] 1 CMLR 309 4.05

Commission v Belgium (C-355/98) [2000] ECR I-1221 15.06

Commission v France (C-23/99) [2000] ECR I-7653 15.37

Commission v France (C-328/07) ECLI:EU:C:2008:113 12.241

Commission v Germany (C-61/94) [1996] ECR I-3989 4.74, 11.79

Commission v Germany (C-395/07) ECLI:EU:C:2008:325 12.241

Commission v Ireland (C-175/05) [2007] OJ C42/07 6.73

Commission v Italy (C-224/00) [2002] ECR I-02965 2.27

Commission v Italian Republic (C-198/05) [2006] OJ C326/06 6.73

Commission v Luxembourg (C-329/07) ECLI:EU:C:2008:9 12.241

Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-53/05) [2006] OJ C212/06 6.73, 6.99

Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-61/05) [2006] OJ C224/06 6.39, 6.46, 6.51

Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-36/05) [2006] OJ C326/06 6.73

Commission v Sweden (C-341/07) ECLI:EU:C:2008:284 12.241

Commission v Systran SA and Systran Luxembourg SA (C-103/11) EU:C:2013:245 5.44, 5.98, 5.102

Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich (C-138/11) [2012] 5 CMLR 13 4.06, 4.34

Consorzio Italiano della Componentistica di Ricambio per Autoveiculi (CICRA) and Maxicar v Régie des Usines Renault (53/87) [1988] ECR 6039 4.13, 4.31

Constantin Film Verleih v YouTube and Google (C-264/19) ECLI:EU:C:2020:542 12.116, 21.48

Continental Can Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc v Commission (C-6/72) [1973] ECR 215 4.11

Coöperatieve Vereniging SNB-REACT UA v Deepak Mehta (C-521/17) ECLI:EU:C:2018:639 12.37, 12.39

Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark A/S (C-463/12) [2015] EUECJ 11.117, 16.76

Coty Germany v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg (C-580/13) ECLI:EU:C:2015:485 12.18, 12.26, 12.106, 12.114, 12.128, 21.48

Coty Germany GmbH (formerly Coty Prestige Lancaster Group) v First Note Perfumes NV (C-360/12) ECLI:EU:C:2014:1318 24.04, 24.05

Coty Prestige Lancaster Group (C-127/09) [2010] ECR I-4965 11.50

Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner (C-5/11) [2012] EUECJ 11.42

Criminal proceedings against Tullio Ratti (148/78) [1979] ECR 1629 5.154

Cowan v Trésor Public (C-186/87) [1989] ECR I-00195 2.21

Dansk Supermarked v Imerco (58/80) [1981] ECR 181 3.07, 11.64

Deckmyn (C-201/13) ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132 16.62

Der Grüne Punkt Duales System v Commission (C-385/07) [2009] ECR I-06155; [2009] CMLR 19 4.24

Deutsche Grammophon v Metro (C-78/70) [1971] ECR 487 1.05, 3.07, 5.76, 11.64

Deutsche Milchkontor and Others v Germany (205/82 to 215/82) [1983] ECR 2633 11.86

DHL Express France SA (formerly DHL International SA) v Chronopost SA (C-235/09) ECLI:EU:C:2011:238 21.66

Diageo Brands v Simiramida-04 EOOD (C-681/13) ECLI:EU:C:2015:471 12.103, 12.140

Directmedia Publishing v Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (C- 304/07) [2008] ECR I-7565 9.46

DR and TV2 Danmark (C-510/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:244, [2012] 2 CMLR 46 5.79, 11.34, 11.86, 11.96, 17.174

Duff and others (C-63/93) [1996] ECR I-569 11.86

Duijnstee v Goderbauer (288/82) [1983] ECR 3663 24.19

eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez and Robert Martinez v MGN Ltd (C-509/09 and C-161/10) ECLI:EU:C:2011:685 21.65

Egeda v Hostelería (C-293/98) ECLI:EU:C:2000:66 7.06, 7.65

Elsevier v Cyando (C-683/18), pending 17.257

EMI-Electrola v Patricia (C-341/87) [1989] ECR 79 1.08, 2.25, 8.07, 11.62

Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission (56 and 58/64) [1966] ECR 429 3.07, 11.64

European Commission v Council (114/12) EU:C:2014:2151 26.01, 26.62

Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited (C-18/18) ECLI:EU:C:2019:821 17.260, 17.272, 19.02, 28.07, 28.10, 28.11, 28.13, 28.14, 28.15, 30.08

Falbert and Others (C-255/16) EU:C:2017:983 17.29, 17.234

Falco Privatstiftung and Thomas Rabitsch v Gisela Weller-Lindhorst (C-533/07) [2009] ECR I-03327 3.08

FDV (C-61/97) [1998] ECR I-5171 11.56, 15.37

Fixtures Marketing Ltd v AB Svenska Spel (C-338/02) [2004] ECR I-10549 9.37, 9.38, 9.42, 9.43

Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou (OPAP) (C-444/02) [2004] ECR I-10365 9.37, 9.38

Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Oy Veikkaus AB (C-46/02) [2004] ECR I-10497 (Veikkaus) 9.37, 9.38

Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08 and C-429/08) [2011] ECR I-09083 3.10, 6.08, 7.14, 7.22, 8.59, 11.13, 11.18, 11.20, 11.24, 11.25, 11.35, 11.58, 11.81, 11.84, 11.87, 11.92, 13.77, 15.37, 16.62, 16.142, 17.75, 17.79, 17.81, 17.103, 20.18, 29.14

Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH (C-173/11) [2013] 1 CMLR (29) 903 9.48, 11.26, 17.68

Football Dataco Ltd v Yahoo! UK Ltd (C-604/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:115 8.59, 9.13, 9.14, 9.16, 9.75, 9.76, 29.02

Foreningen af danske Videogramdistributører, acting for Egmont Film A/S, Metronome in the person of Hans Kristian Pedersen and Others v Laserdisken (C-61/97) [1998] ECR I-5187 6.22, 11.36

Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå u.p.a. (STIM) v SAMI (C-753/18) see STIM v SAMI

France Télécom SA v Commission (C-202/07P) [2009] ECR I-2369; [2007] CMLR 25 4.14, 4.65

François Lucazeau and others v Société des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musique (SACEM) and others (110/88, 241/88 and 242/88) [1989] ECR 2811 14.57

Freistaat Bayern v Verlag Esterbauer GmbH (C-490/14) [2015] Bus LR 1428 9.03

Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull (C-119/10) ECLI:EU:C:2011:837 12.144, 21.57

Fundacion Gala-Salvador Dalí v VEGAP/ADAGP (C-518/08) [2010] ECR I-3091 10.46

Funke Medien (C-469/17) ECLI:EU:C:2019:623 11.94, 11.95, 17.219, 17.265, 17.266, 28.27, 28.36, 28.39, 28.40, 28.41, 28.42, 28.43

Gasser (Erich) GmbH v MISAT Srl (C-116/02) [2003] ECR I-14693 24.26

Generics (UK) Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (C-307/18) EU:C:2020:52 4.76

Germany v Commission [1963] ECR 63 20.03

Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik mbH & Co KG (GAT) v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG (LUK) (C-4/03) [2006] ECR I-6509 24.18, 24.22, 24.23, 24.25, 24.26, 24.27, 24.28, 24.30

Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik GmbH & Co KG v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG (GAT/LuK) (C-315/01) ECLI:EU:C:2003:360 21.66

Glaxosmithkline, Laboratoires Glaxosmithkline v Jean-Pierre Rouard (C-462/06) 24.10

Google France v Louis Vuitton (C-238/08) [2010] EUECJ 11.185

Google France and Google (C-236/08 to C-238/08) ECLI:EU:C:2010:159 12.144, 21.57, 24.85

Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) (C-507/17) ECLI:EU:C:2019:772 28.07, 28.15

GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV, Playboy Enterprises International Inc, Britt Geertruida Dekker (C-160/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:644 11.33, 17.252, 28.24

GVL v Commission (C-7/82) [1983] ECR 00483 2.25, 4.30, 14.29

Haegemann v Belgian State (181/73) [1974] ECR 449 11.79

Hag GF (C-10/89) [1990] ECR I-3711 15.37

Hejduk (Pez) v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH (C-441/13) ECLI:EU:C:2015:28 24.06

Hermès International v FHT Marketing Choice (C-53/96) [1998] ECR I-3603 11.78

Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL (C-572/13) [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:750 6.69, 11.115, 11.121, 16.76, 17.138, 17.226, 17.245, 28.42

Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering (C-387/12) ECLI:EU:C:2014:215 24.04, 24.05

Hilti v Commission (C-53/92 P) [1994] ECR I-667 4.10, 4.11, 4.26, 4.26, 4.39

Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Commission (85/76) [1979] ECR 461; [1979] 3 CMLR 211 4.07, 4.13, 4.14, 4.22

Hofner & Elser v Macrotron GmbH (C-41/90) [1991] ECR I-1979 4.06

Holger Forstmann Transporte (C-152/13) ECLI:EU:C:2014:2184 12.45

Hugin Kassaregister AB and Hugin Cash Registers Ltd v Commission (22/78) [1979] ECR 1869; [1979] 3 CMLR 345 4.05, 4.13

Huawei Technologies Co Ltd v ZTE Corp (C-170/13) EU:C:2015:477, [2015] Bus LR 1261 4.02, 4.29, 4.76

Hydrotherm Gerätebau GmbH v Compact del Dott. Ing. Mario Andreoli (170/83) [1984] ECR 2999 11.64

IMS Health GmbH & Co OHG v NDC Health GmbH & Co KG (C-418/01) [2004] ECR I-5039; [2004] 4 CMLR 28 4.33, 4.51-4.55, 4.59, 4.64

Ince (C-336/14) EU:C:2016:72 17.29, 17.234

Infopaq International v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08) ECLI:EU:C:2009:465 1.12, 1.13, 1.15, 5.36, 5.65, 5.79, 5.98, 9.13, 9.21, 9.26, 11.10, 11.34, 11.81, 11.84, 11.87, 13.77, 17.42, 17.75, 17.76, 17.174, 17.219, 17.220, 17.237, 17.238, 29.01, 29.24

Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (Order of the Court) Infopaq II (C-302/10) 11.84, 11.87, 13.77, 17.75, 17.78, 17.79, 17.81

Innoweb BV v Wegener ICT Media BV, Wegener Mediaventions BV (C-202/12) ECLI:EU:C:2013:850 9.48

Irina Nikolajeva v Multi Protect OÜ (C-280/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:467 12.192

Istituto Chemioterapico Italiano and Commercial Solvents v Commission (6/73 and 7/73) [1974] ECR 223 4.05, 4.30, 4.36, 4.64

IT Development SAS v Free Mobile SAS (C-666/18) EU:C:2019:1099 5.66, 5.96, 5.97, 12.10, 12.29, 21.75

ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup (C-607/11) ECLI:EU:C:2013:147 7.14, 7.16, 11.18, 11.20, 11.35, 11.87

Jean-Claude Arblade & Fils SARL (C-369/96) and Bernard Leloup, Serge Leloup, Sofrage SARL (C-376/96) [1999] ECR I-8453 24.47

Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others (C-201/13) ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132 11.96, 28.24

Kanal 5 Ltd, TV 4 AB v STIM (C-52/07) [2008] ECR I-09275 14.56

Kenny Roland Lyckeskog (C-99/00) ECLI:EU:C:2002:329 21.75

Keurkoop v Nancy Kean Gifts (C-144/81) [1982] ECR 2853 11.62

Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd and Ors and Nokia Corporation v HM Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (C-446/09 and C-495/09) ECLI:EU:C:2011:796 21.78, 21.292

Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera Sverige AB (C-52/09) [2011] ECR I-00527 4.53

L’Oréal v eBay (C-324/09) [2011] ECR I-6011, [2011] ETMR 52 9.49, 11.50, 11.172, 11.185, 12.18, 12.133, 12.144, 12.145, 12.171, 12.181, 21.49, 21.57, 21.148, 21.149, 21.160

Lagardère Active Broadcast v SPRE and Others (C-192/04) 6.94, 7.09, 7.10, 7.12, 11.35, 24.97

Land de Sarre v Ministre de l’Industrie (187/87) ECLI:EU:C:1988:439 12.45

Land Hessen v Ricordi (C-360/00) [2002] ECR I-05089 1.11, 2.26

Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff (C-161/17) ECLI:EU:C:2018:634 7.10, 8.59, 17.252, 28.37, 28.38

Laserdisken ApS v Kulturministeriet (C-479/04) [2006] ECR I-08089 3.16, 5.77, 11.66, 11.105, 21.170

Lassal (C-162/09) ECLI:EU:C:2010:592 12.45

Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV (C-310/17) ECLI:EU:C:2018:899 2.02, 9.13

Liffers v Producciones Mandarina SL, and Mediaset España Comunicación SA (C-99/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:173 21.51

Lippens and Others (C-170/11) ECLI:EU:C:2012:540 12.104

LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (C-557/07) [2009] ECR I-01227. 11.84, 11.191, 11.194, 12.26, 12.122, 12.127, 12.144, 21.57, 21.166

McFadden (Tobias) v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH (C-484/14) ECLI:EU:C:2016:689 11.186, 12.26, 12.177, 12.179, 12.218, 21.142, 21.173, 28.24

Magill see Radio Telefis Eireann v Commission of the European Communities (C-241/91P)

Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel and Others (C-324/08) [2009] ECR I-10019 11.50

Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA (C-98/13) [2014] ETMR 25 11.56

Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let (C-277/10) [2012] OJ C80/12 6.54, 7.12, 8.27, 8.28, 8.31, 11.48, 11.119

Mediakabel BV v Commissariaat voor de Media (C-89/04) ECLI:EU:C:2005:348 7.12, 7.16, 11.35

Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd (C-228/11) ECLI:EU:C:2013:305 24.04, 24.05

Metronome Musik (C-200/96) [1998] ECR I-1953 5.72, 6.22, 6.99, 6.100, 11.56

Ministère public v Jean-Louis Tournier (395/87) [1989] ECR 02521 3.09, 6.17, 11.36, 14.23, 14.51, 14.57

Montis Design BV v Goossens Meubelen BV (C-169/15) [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:790 8.24, 8.72, 8.73

Mund and Fester (C-398/92) [1994] ECR I-00467 2.27

Musik-Vertrieb Membran v GEMA (C-55/80 and 57/80) [1981] ECR 147 1.05, 3.07, 11.64, 15.37

NDC Health v IMS Health and Commission (C-481/01 P(R)) [2002] ECR I-3401 4.51

Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV (C-263/18) ECLI:EU:C:2019:1111 6.100, 11.39

New Wave as v Alltoys spol s.r.o. (C-427/15) ECLI:EU:C:2017:18 12.106, 12.109, 21.56

Nilsson and others (C-162/97) [1998] ECR I-7477 11.86

Nintendo Co Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH and BigBen Interactive SA (C-24/16 and C-25/16) ECLI:EU:C:2017:724 24.92

Nintendo Co Ltd v PC Box Srl and 9Net Srl (C-355/12) EU:C:2014:25 5.05, 5.32, 11.109, 11.129, 13.15

NUV v Tom Kabinet (C-263/18) EU:C:2019:1111 3.13

OPAP see Fixtures Marketing Ltd v Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou (OPAP)

Orange Polska (C-123/16P) ECLI:EU:C:2018:590 4.30

OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázné Mariánské Lázné a.s. (C-351/12) [2014] EUECJ 11.20, 11.118

Organismos Sillogikis Diacheirisis Dimiourgon Theatrikon kai Optikoakoustikon Ergon v Divani Akropolis Anonimi Xenodocheiaki kai Touristiki Etaireai (C-136/09) [2010] ECR I-37 11.21

Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co KG v Mediaprint Zeitungs-und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co KG (C-7/97) [1998] ECR I-7791 4.02, 4.19, 4.32, 4.35, 4.36, 4.46, 4.52, 4.53, 4.55, 4.59

Padawan v SGAE (C-467/08) ECLI:EU:C:2010:620 1.12, 1.13, 11.96, 11.115, 11.118, 16.76

Painer (Eva-Maria) v Standard Verlags GmbH et al. (C-145/10) ECLI:EU:C:2013:138 1.15, 5.37, 8.59, 9.13, 11.106, 16.62, 16.95, 17.219, 24.12, 28.24, 28.41, 29.02, 29.24

Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof (C-585/08 and C-144/09) ECLI:EU:C:2010:740 21.65

Parfums Christian Dior SA v Evora BV (C-337/95) [1997] ECR I-6013 3.08, 28.44

Parke Davis v Proebel (24/67) [1968] ECR 55; [1968] CMLR 47 4.13

Pastoors and Trans-Cap (C-29/95) [1997] ECR I-00285 2.27

Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-582/14) ECLI:EU:C:2016:779 15.30

Peak Holding AB v Axolin-Elinor AB (C-16/03) [2004] ECR I-11313 3.07, 9.49, 11.50

Peek & Cloppenburg v Cassina (C-456/06) [2008] ECR I-2731 3.08, 5.72, 5.84, 11.48, 11.49, 11.56, 11.62

Pelham GmbH, Moses Pelham, Martin Haas v Ralf Hütter, Florian Schneider-Esleben (aka Kraftwerk) (C-476/17) [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:624 6.102, 11.13, 11.94, 11.95

Peter Pickney v KDG Mediatech AG (C-170/12) ECLI:EU:C:2013:635 17.188, 21.65, 24.05

Phil Collins v Imtrat (C-92/92 and 326/92) [1993] ECR 1–05145 1.05, 1.11, 2.02, 2.21, 2.23, 2.25, 2.26, 2.30, 8.71, 10.07, 10.13, 10.59, 14.29, 15.37

Polydor Ltd and RSO Records Inc v Harlequin Record Shops Ltd and Simons Records Ltd (270/80) [1982] ECR 329 11.67

PPL (Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd) v Ireland (C-162/10) [2012] OJ C133/12 6.89, 6.90, 6.95, 6.104, 7.10, 11.21, 11.24, 11.35

Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (C-275/06) [2008] ECR I-271 11.87, 11.191, 11.194, 12.18, 12.26, 12.114, 12.122, 12.127, 16.142, 21.158, 21.165, 21.166, 28.39

Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (C-360/13) ECLI:EU:C:2014:1195 11.10, 11.84, 17.52, 17.75, 17.76, 17.236

Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) v Commission (Magill) (C-241/91P) [1995] ECR I-743; [1995] 4 CMLR 718 4.02, 4.31, 4.32, 4.36, 4.44-4.49, 4.52, 4.53, 4.55, 4.59

Ranks (Aleksandrs) and Vasiļevic (C-166/15) EU:C:2016:762 5.76, 5.83, 5.85, 5.111, 5.136, 11.56

Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (C-406/09) ECLI:EU:C:2011:668 12.208, 12.213, 21.52

Reha Training (C-117/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:309 6.87, 6.89, 11.20, 17.252

Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council (C-401/19), pending 17.260, 17.261

Ricordi see Land Hessen v Ricordi

Roche Nederland BV v Frederick Primus, Milton Goldenberg (Roche/Primus) (C-539/03) ECLI:EU:C:2006:458 21.66, 24.08, 24.09, 24.10, 24.12

Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV (C-30/14) EU:C:2015:10 9.77, 17.70, 17.108

SA Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision, Coditel, and Others v Ciné Vog Films and Others (62/79) see Coditel

St Paul Diary v Unibel (C-104/03) ECLI:EU:C:2005:255 12.104

SAS Institute v World Programming Ltd (C-406/10) EU:C:2012:259 5.12, 5.14, 5.20, 5.22, 5.24, 5.29, 5.29, 5.38, 5.64, 5.101, 5.105, 5.113, 5.114, 5.117, 5.120, 5.130, 5.147, 9.13, 11.13

SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol (C-364/92) [1994] ECR I-43; [1994] 5 CMLR 208 4.06

SBS Belgium (C-325/14) ECLI:EU:2015:764 7.10, 20.26

Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM) (C-70/10) [2011] ECR I-11959 11.176, 12.18, 12.26, 12.122, 12.133, 12.144, 12.181, 17.266, 21.49, 21.57, 21.158, 21.160, 21.162, 21.169, 28.24

Schawe v Saechsiches Druck- und Verlagshaus (C-215/07) [2007] OJ C-155/12 9.34

Schieving-Nijstad (C-89/99) ECLI:EU:C:2001:438 12.101

Sebago Inc and Ancienne Maison Dubois & Fils SA v G-B Unic SA (C-173/98) [1999] ECR I-04103 5.81, 11.66

SENA (C-245/00) [2003] ECR I-1251 1.13, 6.87, 6.92, 6.93, 6.96, 11.34, 11.96, 17.174

SETTG (C-398/95) [1997] ECR I-3091 15.37

SGAE (C-306/05) ECLI:EU:C:2006:764 1.12, 7.06, 7.16, 11.34, 11.96, 16.142, 17.98, 17.174

Shevill and Others v Presse Alliance SA (C-68/93) [1995] ECR I-415 24.02, 24.05

Silhouette International Schmied GmbH & Co. KG v Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH (C-355/96) [1998] ECR I-04799 11.67

Simiramida-04 EOOD v Diageo Brands BV (C-681/13) ECLI:EU:C:2015:471 12.208, 21.52

Sirena (C-40/70) [1971] ECR 69 11.64

Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05) [2006] ECR I I-11519 11.21, 11.35

Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso (C-135/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:140 4.75, 6.98, 11.23, 11.24, 11.35, 17.252

Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) and Others v Institut national de l’audiovisuel (C-484/18) ECLI:EU:C:2019:970 17.252

Softwarová (C-393/09) [2010] ECR I-13971 5.08, 5.12, 5.16, 5.18, 5.19, 5.22, 5.26, 5.27, 5.36, 6.86, 6.87, 6.88, 6.89, 9.13, 11.24

Solvay SA v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe BV, Honeywell Belgium NV and Honeywell Europe NV (C-616/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:445 24.12

Sony Music Entertainment GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (C-240/07) [2009] ECR I-00263 8.60, 8.70

Sot Lelos kai Sia EE v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-468/06) [2008] ECR I-07139 4.30

Soulier (Marc) & Doke (Sara) v Premier Ministre (C-301/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:878 4.19, 4.77, 13.24, 17.171, 17.252, 28.37

Spiegel Online v Volker Beck (C-516/17) ECLI:EU:C:2019:625 11.94, 11.95, 11.106, 17.252, 17.265, 17.266, 28.32, 28.36, 28.39, 28.40, 28.41, 28.42, 28.43

SRL CILFIT v Ministero della Sanità (C-283/81) [1982] ECR 3415 11.96

Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15) ECLI:EU:C:2017:300 11.31, 11.84, 11.186, 17.236, 17.252

Stichting Brein v Ziggo (C-610/15) EU:C:2017:456 11.24, 11.35, 17.236, 17.252

Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH and Others (C-462/09) [2011] ECDR 18 11.119

STIM v SAMI (C-753/18) ECLI:EU:C:2020:268. 1.12, 6.87, 11.24

Stitching de Thuiskopie (C-435/12) ECLI:EU:C:2014:254 16.76

Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’ w Oławie v Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich w Warszawie (C-367/15) ECLI:EU:C:2017:36 12.16, 12.20, 12.196, 12.197, 12.201, 12.203, 12.204, 12.211, 21.51

Svensson (Nils) v Retriever Sverige AB (C-466/12) [2014] EUECJ 11.09, 11.18, 11.31, 11.32, 11.101, 17.236, 28.42

Sweden and Others v API and Commission (C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P) [2010] ECR I-8533 27.50

Technische Universität Darmstadt (C-117/13) [2014] EUECJ 11.105

Tetra Pak v Commission (C-333/94) [1996] ECR I-5951 4.28

Tiercé Ladbroke (C-300/97P), removed from the register 11 Feb 1999 4.33, 4.50, 4.65

Tod’s SpA (C-28/04) [2005] ECR I-05781 1.11, 2.27

Tom Kabinet (C-263/18) EU:C:2019:1111 11.48

Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC and Others v Delta Center a.s. (C-494/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:528 12.144, 12.145, 12.171, 12.181, 21.57

Top Logistics & Van Caem International v Bacardi (C-379/14) ECLI:EU:C:2015:497 12.144, 21.57

Gregory Paul Turner v Ismail Grovit (C-159/02) [2004] ECR I-3565 24.26, 24.27

TV 10 SA v Commissariaat voor de Media (C-23/93) [1994] ECR I-4795 15.06

Uber France (C-320/16) EU:C:2018:221 17.29, 17.234

Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) and British Sky Broadcasting Ltd v Euroview Sport Ltd (C-228/10) ECLI:EU:C:2012:6 7.12

United Brands v Commission (27/76) [1978] ECR 207 4.08, 4.09, 4.13, 4.14, 4.30, 4.36, 4.39

United Pan-Europe Communications Belgium and Others (C-250/06) [2007] ECR I-11135 15.37

United Video Properties Inc v Telenet NV (C-57/15) ECLI:EU:C:2016:611 12.203, 12.210, 12.213, 12.215, 12.217, 21.52

UPC Telekabel Wien (C-314/12) [2014] EUECJ 11.121, 11.172, 11.193, 12.26, 12.143, 12.145, 12.179, 12.180, 21.57, 21.167- 21.172, 21.173, 12.179, 21.182, 28.24

Uradex SCRL v Union Professionnelle de la Radio et de la Teledistribution (RTD) (C-169/05) ECLI:EU:C:2006:365 7.70

UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp (C-128/11) ECLI:EU:C:2012:407 1.13, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 5.04, 5.05, 5.17, 5.72, 5.79, 5.80, 5.82, 5.87, 5.88, 5.91, 5.102, 5.106, 6.57, 9.25, 9.58, 9.59, 11.34, 11.37, 11.38, 11.42, 11.48, 11.56, 11.58, 17.98, 17.174, 21.35

UTECA (C-222/07) [2009] ECR I-1407 15.37

Van Binsbergen v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging (33/74) [1974] ECR 1299 15.06

van Duyn (Yvonne) v Home Office (41/74) [1974] ECR 1337 5.154, 16.141

VCAST Ltd v RTI SpA (C-265/16) [2017] EUECJ 11.119

Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht (C-174/15) [2016] ECR 459 6.20

Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat (C-271/10) [2011] 11.96

Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk (C-641/15) ECLI:EU:C:2017:131 7.10

VEWA v Belgische Staat (C-271/10) [2011] OJ C252/11 6.70

VG Media Gesellschaft zur Verwertung der Urheber- und Leistungsschutzrechte von Medienunternehmen mbH v. Google LLC (C-299/17) Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 September 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:716 17.225

VG Wort (C-457/11 to C-460/11) ECLI:EU:C:2013:426 11.70, 16.76, 17.138

Volk v Vervaecke (5/69) [1969] ECR 295; [1969] CMLR 273 4.27

Volvo v Erik Veng (238/87) [1988] ECR 6211 4.04, 4.13, 4.31, 4.32, 4.49, 4.62, 4.65

Warner Brothers v Christiansen (C-158/86) [1988] ECR 2605 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 3.09, 6.03, 6.12, 6.21, 6.28, 6.99, 11.36, 11.56

Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (C-523/10), ECLI:EU:C:2012:220 21.65

Wouters v Algemene Raad van Dederlandsche Orde van Advocaten (C-309/99) [2002] ECR I-1577; [2002] 4 CMLR 913 4.06

Yiadom (C-357/98) [2000] ECR I-9265 11.34, 17.98, 17.174

YouTube (C-682/18), pending 17.250

Zino Davidoff and Levi Strauss (C-414/99 to C-416/99) [2001] ECR I-8691 5.81, 11.63

Decision of the CJEU of December 2012 concerning public access to documents held by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the exercise of its administrative functions (2013/C 38/02) 27.48

Art 1 27.47

Art 4 27.48

Art 6 27.48

Art 9 27.51

Opinion of the CJEU (Grand Chamber) of 14 February 2017 (C-3/15) ECLI:EU:C:2017:114 16.31

Opinion 1/17 of Advocate General Bot of 29 January 2019, Request for an opinion by the Kingdom of Belgium 21.227

General Court

Bayer v Commission [2000] ECR II-3383 4.27

Clearstream Banking v Commission (T-301/04) [2009] ECR II-3155; [2009] 5 CMLR 24 4.02, 4.30

Clipboard formats II/Microsoft (T-411/03) 5.07

Contact Software v European Commission (T-751/15) ECLI:EU:T:2017:602 4.02

European Night Services Ltd (ENS) v Commission (T-374/94, T-375/94, T-384/94 and T-388/940) [1998] ECR II-3141; [1998] 5 CMLR 718 4.02

Federación Nacional de Empresas de Instrumentación Científica, Médica, Técnica y Dental (FENIN) v Commission (T-319/99) [2003] ECR II-357 4.06

Google v Commission (T-612/17), in progress 4.36, 4.79

Hilti v Commission (T-30/89) [1991] ECR II-1439 4.10, 4.13, 4.26, 4.37

IMPALA (T-464/04) [2006] ECR II 2289 4.03, 4.16, 4.72

IMS Health Inc v Commission (No 1) (T-184/01R) [2001] ECR II-2349; [2002] 4 CMLR 1 4.51

Ladbroke Racing v Commission (T-32/93) [1994] ECR II-1015 4.33

Microsoft Corp (Computing Technology Industry Association Inc and Others, intervening) v Commission (Software & Information Industry Association and Others, intervening) (T-201/04) [2007] ECR II-3601; [2007] 5 CMLR 11 4.02, 4.28, 4.30, 4.32, 4.34, 4.41, 4.43, 4.56–4.63, 4.64, 4.65, 4.66, 4.74, 4.75, 5.124, 5.146

Orange Polska SA v Commission (T-486/11) EU:T:2015:1002 4.30

Software v Commission (T-751/15) ECLI:EU:T:2017:602 4.02

Systran SA and Systran Luxembourg SA v European Commission (T-19/07) [2010] ECR II-06083 5.44, 5.98, 12.51

Tetra Pak v Commission (Tetra Pak II) (T-83/91) [1994] ECR II-755 4.28

Tiercé Ladbroke v Commission (T-504/93) [1997] ECR II-923 4.33, 4.50

Commission Decisions

B&I Line v Sealink Harbours and Stena Sealink [1992] 5 CMLR 255 4.02

British Midland/Aer Lingus (Case IV/33544), Comm Dec 92/213/EEC, 1992 OJ (L 96) 34 4.02

CISAC (COMP/C2/38.698) Proceeding under Article 81 EC Treaty and Article 53 EEA Agreement (2008) 3435 final, Brussels, 16 July 2008, [2009] 4 CMLR 12 14.03, 14.21

Continental Can [1972] CMLR D11 4.11

Cross-border access to pay-TV [2019] 4 CMLR 45 4.48

Daft Punk (COMP/C2/37.219) Banghalter/Homem Christo v SACEM 14.30

ENI (COMP/39.315) [2010] OJ C352/8 September 29, 2010 4.37, 4.40, 4.50

GEMA I, Comm Dec 71/224/EEC of 2 June 1971 Proceeding under Article 86 of the EEC Treaty (IV/26 760 – GEMA), OJ L 134/15 of 20.6.1971 ([1971] CMLR D35) 4.15, 14.26, 14.29, 14.36

GEMA II (Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte) Comm Dec 72/268, [1972] OJ L 166/22 14.26, 14.36

Flughafen Frankfurt [1998] OJ L72/30; 4 CMLR 779 4.40

Google Android Commission decision AT.40099 18.7.2018 4.28, 4.79

Google Search (Shopping) Case AT.39740 [2018] 4 CMLR 12 4.36, 4.79

IFPI Simulcasting (COMP/C2/38.014) Comm Dec 2003/300/EC of 8 October 2002 Proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, OJ L 107/58 of 30.4.2003 14.21, 14.48, 14.52

IMS 2002/165/EC 4.51

Irish Continental Group/CCI Morlaix (Port of Roscoff) [1995] CMLR 77 4.02, 4.06

Italian Flat Glass OJ 1999 L33/44, [1990] 4 CMLR 535 4.03

London-European Sabena (Case IV/32.318) Comm Dec 88/589/EEC, 1988 OJ L 317/ 47 4.02

Microsoft (COMP/C 3–37.792) Dec of 24 March 2004, case COM (2004) 900 final and publication of an extract in OJ L-32/23, 6 Feb 2007 4.146

Motorola/Google v Apple, Commission, May 2013 4.29

NDC Health v IMS Health (Interim measures) (COMP D3/38.044) 2002 OJ L 59/18 4.51

OLAF Comm Dec 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 28 April 1999, as amended [2013] OJ L257/19) 21.128

Port of Rødby, Comm Dec 94/119/EC, 1994 OJ (L 055) 52 4.02

Rambus (COMP/38.636), 9.12.2009 4.29

Reuter/BASF [1976] 2 CMLR D44 4.06

Sea Containers v Stena Link, Interim Measures (Case IV/34.689) Comm Dec 94/19/EC, 1994 OJ (L 015) 8 4.02, 4.38

Sealink/Holyhead and IMS 4.69

Tetra Pak II [1992] 4 CMLR 76 4.25, 4.37

Council Decisions

Council Decision 2014/221/EU of 14 April 2014, relying on the EU exclusive competence to ratify the Treaty, also on behalf of Member States, based on Articles 114 and 207 TFEU 16.29

Council Decision 2000/278/EC, OJ L89/6, 11.4.2000 26.03

Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States [2002] OJ L190/1 21.95

Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009 amending Framework Decisions 2002/584/JHA, 2005/214/JHA, 2006/783/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA 21.95

Decision 2002/187/JHA setting up Eurojust 21.127

EFTA Court

L’Oréal Norge AS v Per Aarskog AS and L’Oréal SA v Smart Club AS (E-9/07 and E-10/07) [2008] ETMR 60 11.67

Norwegian Government, represented by the Royal Ministry of Social Affairs and Health v Astra Norge AS (E-I/98) [1998] EFTA 140 3.08

EPO Technical Board of Appeal

IBM, Case T117/97 5.145

European Court of Human Rights

Akdeniz v Turkey, App No 20877/10 21.181

Anheuser-Busch Inc v Portugal, App No 73049/01 21.183

Ashby Donald and others v France, App No 36769/08 11.89, 11.90, 11.91, 21.183, 21.184, 28.23, 28.25

Association Ekin v France, App No 39288/98, 21.180

Axel Springer Verlag AG v Germany (Grand Chamber) 7 February 2012 21.183

Cengiz and Others v Turkey, App Nos 48226/10 and 14027/11 21.181

James v UK (1986) 8 EHRR 123 11.118

K U v Finland, App No 2872/02 21.177

Melnychuk v Ukraine, App No 28743/03 21.183

Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v Switzerland, App No 16354/06 (13 July 2012) 21.176, 21.183

Neij (Fredrik) and Peter Sunde Kolmisoppi (The Pirate Bay) v Sweden, App No 40397/12 11.89, 11.194, 28.25

Observer and The Guardian v UK, App No 13585/88 21.183

Pravoye Delo Editorial Team and Shtekel v Ukraine, App No 33014/05 21.179

RTBF v Belgium, App No 50084/06 21.183

Times Newspapers Ltd v UK (Nos 1 and 2), App Nos 3002/03 and 23676/03 21.178

Ürper and Others v Turkey, App Nos 14526/07, 14747/07, 15022/07, 15737/07, 36137/07, 47245/07, and 50371/07 21.182

Yıldırım v Turkey, 18 December 2012, App No 3111/1 21.170, 21.180, 21.181, 21.182

WTO Dispute Settlement Panel

China – Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, WT/DS362/R, 09/0240, 26/01/2009 21.243

Saudi Arabia – Measures concerning the protection of intellectual property rights, WTO DS/567 21.200, 21.264

US v China, China – Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, WT/DS362/R,09/0240, 26.01.2009 21.90, 21.241

United States – Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act (United States – Section 110(5)) WT/DS160/R) (Irish Music) 21.200, 21.264

NATIONAL CASES

Austria

Adolf Loos-Werke II, judgment of 28 September 1993, [1994] GRUR Int 638 24.81

Attco, judgment of 28 July 1983, [1984] GRUR Int 453 24.81

Hotel-Video, judgment of 17 June 1986, [1986] GRUR Int 728 24.81

Meteodata v Bernegger Bau, Supreme Ct, 17 December 2002 11.09

Sacher Hotel, judgment of 14 January 1986, [1986] GRUR Int 735 24.81

Sachverständingenprüfung, judgment of 18 September 1990, [1991] GRUR Int 650 24.81

Übungsprogramm, Supreme Ct, OGH 4 Ob 65/92, MR 1992, 244 5.53

Belgium

Belgian Association of Newspaper Editors v Google (5 May 2011) 11.09, 11.13

Dekimo, Supreme Court, 3 June 2010, R.D.T.I. 2011, 89 5.53

Epic Medical Equipment Services and Hospitera v Delaware Nellcor Puritain Bennet, CFI Brussels, 22 September 2000, [2000] Ing. Cons. 292 24.26

Roche v Wellcome Foundation Ltd, CA Brussels, 20 February 2001, [2001] IRDI 169 24.26

Telenet, case No P.13.0550.N/1, Supreme Court, 22 October 2013 21.162

X v Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht and others, 1 October 2010, Supreme Court 24.17, 24.34

Hof van Cassatie/Cour de Cassation, 30 September 2016 20.26

Canada

Alberta (Education) v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright), 2012 CSC 37, 2 RCS 345 11.69

CCH Canadienne Limitée v Barreau du Haut-Canada Supreme Court, 4 March 2004, (2004 CSC 13) 11.69

Société canadienne des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique v Bell Canada, 12 July 2012, 2012 CSC 36, 2 RCS 3326 11.69

Denmark

Home v Ofir, Maritime and Commercial Court, Copenhagen, 24 February 2006 11.09

Newspaper Publishers’ Association v Newsbooster.com ApS, 7 May 2002, Bailiff’s Court (World eBusiness Law Report, 12 May 2003). 11.09

Western High Court, 20 April 2001 11.30

Finland

Adobe Systems Inc v A Software Distributor, Supreme Ct, 3 October 2003, [2004] ECDR (30) 303 5.141

France

AMC Promotion v CD Publishers Construct Data Verlag GmbH, T. Com. Paris, 16 February 2001 9.36

Anne Bragance v Olivier Orban and Michel de Grèce, 1 February 1989, CA Paris, (1989) 142 RIDA 301 24.37

Antonio Martinelli and Roberto Meazza v Editions Gallimard and Sté APA, 2 April 2003 Fourth Chamber CA Paris, (2003) 198 RIDA 413 24.81, 24.89

APC v Auchan Telecom, TGI Paris, 28 November 2013, 21.169, 21.171, 21.172

Claude Bolling, 22 March 1993, TGI Paris (1993) 157 RIDA 286 24.37

Credinfor v Artprice.com, CA Paris, 18 June 2003, Jurisdata, n. 223155 9.54

Didier Barbelivien and Gilbert Montagné v Sté AGAPES and others, 3 September 1997, Third chamber TGI Paris, (1998) 175 RIDA 343 24.89

DM v APP, Microsoft, Sacem and others, Paris CA, Pol 5, Ch 13, 7 June 2017 11.190

Furtwängler, Cour de cassation, Civ. 1, 4 January 1964, Bull. Civ. 1964, n° 17 6.79

Havas Numerique SNC and Cadres On Line S.A. v Keljob, 26 December 2000, Paris Commercial Court, on Appeal, later by the Paris Civil Court 11.09

Hugo v Plon SA, Cass., 1e civ., Jan. 30 2007, (2007) 38 IIC 736, 738 28.21

Jean Lamore v Universal City Studios and others, Cour de Cassation (first civil chamber) 30 January 2007, (2007) 212 RIDA 261 24.84

Korda v Onion/The Onion, Cour de Cassation, Cass. 1re Civ., 22/01/2014, case 11-26822 ECLI:FR:CCASS: 2014:C100060 24.05

Lancôme, Supreme Court (Cass. Comm.), 13 December 2013, n. 11-19872 2.02

Lectiel v France Télécom (Cass. Chambre commerciale, financière et économique), 23 March 2010, (2010) 225 Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 373 9.39

Précom, Ouest France Multimedia v Direct Annonces, Court of Cassation (Cass.), 1st civ., 5 March 2009 9.39, 9.77

PR Line v Newsinvest, CA Versailles, 11 April 2002 [2002] CCE, July/August 2002, 20–22 9.58

Samuel v BBC, Cass. 1re Civ., 22/01/2014, case 11-24019, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:C100039 24.06

Sisro v Ampersand Software BV, Cour de Cassation 5 March 2002, Cass., 1ère civ, [2002] JCP II 10082 24.81

Soc. Europe 1 Communication v SPRE, 4th Chamber A, CA Paris 3 October 2001, [2002] RCDIP 315 24.97

Tiscali Media/Dargaud Lombard, Lucky Comics (Cour d’appel de Paris 4ème chambre, section A Arrêt, 07.06.2006) 11.186

Cour de cassation, Civ. 1, 22 March 1988 (2 decisions: Bull. Civ. 88, p. 56; 89, p. 57 (public performing of recordings in discotheques) 6.17

Conseil Constitutionnel, 27 July 2006, Recital 13, JO 3 August 2006, 11541ff 2.27

Court of Appeal of Bastia (24.09.2008) 11.185

Constitutional Court, 10 June 2009 (Décision n° 2009-580 DC) Restrictions to internet access 21.247

Cass. Com. 20 October 2011, RTD com. 2011, 760 5.147

Décision no 2012–276 QPC du 28 septembre 2012, Constitutional court 10.47

First Instance Criminal Court of Paris, 2 April 2015 11.190

Cass., Bull. 1e civ., May 15, 2015, Bull. civ. I, No. 13-2739 28.22

TGI Paris, Mar. 9, 2017, No. 15/01086 28.23

Cour de Cassation, Cass. 1ère civ. 11 mai 2017, n°15-29.374, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100563 17.219

Court of Appeal of Versailles, March 16, 2018, No. 15/06029 28.22

Cass. Crim, 20th June 2018, n° 17-86402 28.22

Cour de Cassation in case n°10-15.890 24.05

Decision No 1009/2020 of the Conseil d’Etat, EYED 14.45

Competition Authority, Décision n°20-MC-01 du 9 avril 2020 relative à des demandes de mesures conservatoires présentées par le Syndicat des éditeurs de la presse magazine, l'Alliance de la pressed'information générale e.a.et l’Agence France-Presse 17.228

Germany

Bob Dylan, Constitutional Court, GRUR 1990, 438ff 2.12

Database Rights, re Case I ZR 159/10, 22 June 2011 [2012] ECC 20 9.46, 9.47

DNPA v Google (November 2008) 11.09

Elektronischer Zolltariff, 30 April 2009 (2009) GRUR 852 9.41

EMI Electrola, Landgericht Hamburg 8.07

Google Image search 11.102

Hit Bilanz case, 21 July 2005, I ZR 290/02 9.03

Joseph Beuys case BGH [1994] NJW 2888 10.10

Kettenbandförderer III, 1 February 1994, LG Düsseldorf 4 O 193/87 24.85

Leistungsschutzurteile, BGH 31 May 1960, BGHZ 33, 1, BGHZ 33, 20, BGHZ 33, 38, BGHZ 33, 48 6.79

Man spricht deutsch, Decision 13 October 2004, case I ZR 49/03 [2005] GRUR 48 7.60

Marktstudien (Market Surveys), BGH 21 April 2005, Case I ZR 1/02 [2005] GRUR 940, [2006] IIC 489 9.40, 9.45, 9.49

Museumsfotos, Case I ZR 104/17, BGH, 20 December 2018 17.218

Musical Hits Database (Hit Bilanz), re Case I ZR 290/02, 21 July 2005 9.45, 9.46, 9.81

Parfummarken Case I ZR 164/16, 9th November 2017, Bundesgerichtshof 24.92

OEM-Version software, 6 July 2000, I ZR 244/97 (2001) GRUR 153 5.86, 11.65

Reinigungmittel für Kunststoffverarbeitungsmaschinen, 16 January 1996, LG Düsseldorf [1996] Entsch. LG Düss. 1 24.85

Rolling Stones, BGH, April 21, 1994 2.25

Saechsiger Ausschreibungsdiesnt, 28 September 2006 [2007] GRUR 500; [2007] GRUR Int. 532 9.34

Sender Fellsberg, BGH 7 November 2002, [2003] GRUR 328 24.97

Sonnenblende II, 22 September 1998, LG Düsseldorf [1998] Entsch. LG Düss. 75 24.85

Telemedicus, OLG Stuttgart 21 January 2008, Az. 2 WS 328/07; 2 Ws 328/2007 11.25

Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt GmbH v Paperboy, Bundesgerichtshof No 1 ZR 259/00, 17 July 2003, [2005] ECDR 7 11.09, 11.30

Vorschaubilder I, BGH, I ZR 69/08, 29 April 2010 11.100

Vorschaubilder II, BGH, I ZR 140/10, 19 October 2011. 11.100

Wagenfeld-Leuchte decision of the Bundesgerichtshof of 15 February 2007 (1 ZR 114/04) [2007] GRUR 871 24.83

VG Wort, Az.: I ZR 198/13, decision, 4/21/16 17.248

Bundesgerichtshof, 21 October 1964 [1965] GRUR Int 504 24.36

BGH of 2 May 2002 Case IZR 45/01 Faxkarte of BGHZ 150, 377; [2002] GRUR Int 1046; [2002] ZUM-RD 573 12.59

BGH17 December 2010 ‘Preußische Schlösser und Gärten’, (2011) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 64, 753 22.59

BGH 1 March 2013 ‘Preußische Schlösser und Parkanlagen’, (2013) Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 57, 571 22.59

BGH 19 December 2014 ‘Preußische Kunstwerke’, (2015), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 59, 496 22.59

Federal Supreme Court, 21st February 2019, I ZR 98/17, I ZR 99/17 and I ZR 15/18 28.22

Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) 1 BvR 1248/11) of 15 December 2011 11.150

CA Cologne, Decision of 16 March 2012, No 6 U 206/11 11.30

CA Dusseldorf, Decision I-20 U 42/11 8 October 2011 11.09, 11.30

Landgericht Bielefeld – case no 4 O 191/11) decision (held on 5.3.2013 11.48

Landesgericht München I 21st Civ Chamber, judgment of 21 February 2007, [2008] ZUM-RD 310 24.90

OLG Hamm, 22 U 60/13, 15.5.014 11.37, 11.48

OLG Karlsruhe 1 October 1996, case 6 U 40/95 (Dongle) (1996) IIC 740 5.107

OLG Munich, 29 April 2010, Case 29 U 3698/09 6.08

OLG München, 17 July 2018 – 18 W 858/18, [2018] GRUR-RS 17447 17.269

OLG München, 24 August 2018 – 18 W 1294/18, [2019] AfP 57 17.269

OLG Munchen, BMG Records GmbH v Heise Zeitshcriften Verlag GmbH & KG, No 29 U 2887/05 28 July 2005 ECLR vol 10, No 31, 792 11.146

OLG Oldenburg, 1 July 2019 – 13 W16/19 17.269

Greece

Case No 4658/2012, Court of First Instance, Athens (preliminary injunction), https://opi.gr/images/library/nomologia/politika/mpr/4658_2012.pdf  12.147

Italy

Macchine Automatiche v Windmoller & Holscher KG, judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 December 2003 24.26

Stiftung Seebüll Ada und Emil Nolde, 4 February 1997, CA Milan [1998] GRUR Int 503 24.81

Japan

CA Tokyo, decision of 27 January 2000 [2001] GRUR Int 83 24.83

Netherlands

Autonet v Promasy, Pres. Arr. Arnhem, 27 December 2004 9.07

Bigott v Doucal, 27 January 1995, [1995] NIPR 388 24.81

Cassina v Sedeti, Hoge Raad, 26 May 2000, EIPR 2001 2.27

COVA v Banque Générale du Luxembourg [1994] NJ 2901 (No 622) 24.81

Dafurnica (Nadia Plesner Joensen v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA), District Court The Hague, 4 May 2011, IER 2011/39. 28.20

Diplomatic Card/Forax, Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) 19 January 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:56 5.22

Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v. Nadia Plesner Joensen, District Court The Hague, 27 January 2011, LJN: BP9616 KG RK 10-214 28.20

Mom v VNU, Arrondissementsrechtbank Haarlem, 22 March 2006, 2006 AMI 136 11.30

NVM v Zoekallehuizen.nl, Pres. Arr. Arnhem, 16 March 2006, upheld by CA Arnhem, 4 July 2006 9.38

Parfums Christian Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v. Evora BV Supreme Court, 20th October 1995 28.44

Sanoma Media, Playboy Enterprises International and X v GS Media (GeenStijl), Rb. Amsterdam 12 September 2012 11.30

Wegener v Hunter Select, CA Leeuwarden, 27 November 2002 9.54

Zoekallehuizen.nl v NVM, District Court (Arrondissementsrechtbank) Arnhem, 16 March 2006 11.09

Rb Haarlem 17 August 2011 (case nr 173726/HA ZA 10–1325) 11.30

CA Amsterdam 15 January 2013 (case nr. 200.095.838/01 11.30

CA Arnhem, judgment of 26 June 1993, [1995] BIE 44, [1995] NIPR 555 24.81

Norway

Fin Eiendom AS v Notar AS Trondheim District Court, 29 January 2004 [2004] ECLR 9, (7), 18 February 2004 11.09

Napster.no, Court of Appeal, 3 March 2004, 11.30

Peru

Peruvian Copyright Commission INDECOPI, Decision 3 November 2009 24.83

Spain

Aranzadi, Case STS 988/2008, 30 January 2008 9.77

Programacion Integral v TLR Soft, 11 November 2002 9.58

Ryanair v Atrapalo, Case STS 572/2012, 9 October 2012. 9.40, 9.77

Supreme Court, Case STS 7176/2008, 18 December 2008 9.08

Sweden

Tommy Olsson, Supreme Court, 15 June 2000 11.30

Switzerland

Amfit-Lizenz, 29th August 2000, Bundesgericht [2001] GRUR Int 477 24.36

Eurojobs Personaldienstleistungen SA v Eurojob AG, 23 October 2006, Handelsgericht, Zurich 24.22

Eurojobs Personaldienstleistungen SA v Eurojob AG, Federal Ct, 4 April 2007, I. Zivilabteilung 4C.439/2006 24.22

United Kingdom

Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd [1975] EWCA Civ 12 12.87

Apple Corps Ltd and Another v Apple Computer Inc and Others [1992] FSR 431, 433 24.67

Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed (No 2) [2003] 3 All ER 865, [2003] RPC 696 (CA) 24.80

BASCA v Secretary of State for Business and Innovation [2015] EWHC 1723; [2015] EWHC 2041 11.120

British Horseracing Board v William Hill [2001] RPC 612 9.42

British Telecommunications plc v Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, Case C1/2011/1437, [2012] EWCA Civ 232 21.159

Canon KK v Green Cartridge Co [1997] AC 728, [1997] FSR 817 4.13

Cartier International and Others v BSkyB and others [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch) 11.190

Forth Dodge Animal Health Ltd v Akzo Nobel NV [1998] FSR 222 24.26

Gerard and Daniela Maher v Groupama Grand Est [2009] EWCA Civ 1191 24.89

ITV Publications v Time Out [1984] FSR 84 4.44

John Walker & Sons Ltd v Henry Ost & Co Ltd [1970] 2 All ER 106, [1970] 1 WLR 917 24.94

Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment Inc v Ball [2004] EWHC 1738 (Ch); [2004] ECDR 33, 323, [2005] FSR 9, [2005] ECC 24 5.140, 5.142, 11.130

L’Oréal SA, Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments (t/a Honeypot Cosmetic & Perfumery Sales) and Starion International Ltd [2008] ETMR 1, [2008] RPC 9 (CA) 24.80

Lakeview Computer Services plc v Steadman (1990) (unreported) 5.53

Lucasfilm Ltd and others (Appellants) v Ainsworth and another (Respondents) [2011] UKSC 39 28.11

Magill [2002] EWCA 1905, [2003] FSR 33 CA 4.34

Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA [1975] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 509 12.151

Mars UK v Teknowledge [2000] FSR 138 9.07

Newzbin II case [2011] EWHC 2714 (Ch) 21.162

Public Relations Consultant Association Limited v Newspaper Licensing Agency and others UKSC 18 11.84

Purple Parking Ltd v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2011] EWHC 987 (Ch) 4.40

Ralli Bros v Cia Naviera Sota y Aznar [1920] 2 KB 287 24.50

Research in Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation [2008] FSR 20, (2008) 15(11) LSG 23 24.27

SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 5.20, 5.31

8PM Chemist Ltd v Eli Lilly Co and Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 24 21.39

Twentieth Century Fox and others v British Telecommunications plc [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) 11.190

Unlockd Ltd v Google Ireland Ltd [2018] EWHC 1363 (Ch) 4.69

Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344 4.02, 4.29

Competition Appeal Tribunal

Unlockd Ltd v Google Ireland Ltd [2019] CAT 17 4.69

Office of Fair Trading

EI du Pont de Nemours & Co/Op Graphics (Holography) Ltd, Decision CA98/07/2003 4.32

Patents Court

Knorr-Bremse Systems for Commercial Vehicles Ltd v Haldex Brake Products GmbH.47, 7 February 2008, [2008] EWHC 156 (Pat), [2008] ILPr 26. 24.21

United States of America

A&M Records v Napster, 239 F.3d 1004, 1027 (9th Cir. 2001) 19.09, 19.10

Agence Fr. Presse v Morel, 934 F.Supp. 2d 547, 566 (S.D.N.Y. 2013 19.10

Aimster, in re 334 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2003) 19.11

ALS Scan, Inc v RemarQ Communities, Inc., 239 F.3d 619, 625 (4th Cir. 2001) 19.10

Authors Guild Inc v Google Inc 804 F. 3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015) 4.19, 17.168

BMG Rights Mgmt. (US) LLC v Cox Communs., Inc., 881 F.3d 293 (4th Cir. 2018) 19.04

BWP Media USA Inc. v Hollywood Fan Sites LLC, 115 F.Supp.3d 397, 402–03 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) 19.10

Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 US 569, 579 (1994) 4.19

Capitol Records LLC (EMI) v ReDigi Inc No. 12–00095 (30 March 2013) SD New York (U.S. District Court) 11.37, 11.48

Capitol Records, LLC v Vimeo, LLC, 826 F.3d 78, 93–97 (2d Cir. 2016) 19.10, 19.11

Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v Fung, 710 F.3d 1020, 1045–46 (9th Cir. 2013) 19.10, 19.13

CoStar Grp. v LoopNet Inc., 373 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir. 2004) 19.10

EMI Christian Music Group v MP3Tunes, 844 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2016) 19.04, 19.10, 19.11, 19.13, 19.14

Hendrickson v eBay, 165 F.Supp. 2d 1082, 1088 (C.D. Cal. 2001) 19.10

Io Grp. v Veoh Networks, Inc., 586 F.Supp.2d 1132, 1150 (N.D.Cal. 2008) 19.10

Johnson v New Destiny Christian Ctr. Church, Inc., 6:17-cv-710-Orl-37DCI, 2019 WL 1014245 at *4–5 (M.D. Fl. March 4, 2019), appeal pending 19.17

Kelly v Arriba Soft Corp, 336 F. 3d 811 (2003) 11.102

Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons No 11–697, 19 March 2013 11.48

Lenz v Universal Music Corp., 815 F.3d 1145, 1153 (9th Cir. 2016) 19.17, 19.18

Long v Dorset, 369 F.Supp.3d 939 (N.D.Cal. 2019) 19.10

Mavrix Photographs, LLC v LiveJournal, Inc., 873 F.3d 1045, 1057–58 (2d Cir. 2017) 19.10, 19.14

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd 545 US 913 (2005) 24.85

Microsoft Corp v AT&T Corp 550 US 437 (2007), [2007] GRUR Int 768 24.83

National Football League v PrimeTime 24 Joint Venture, CA Second Circuit [2000] GRUR Int 1082 24.83

Omega SA v Costco Wholesale Corp (3 September 2008) 11.48

Online Policy Grp v Diebold, Inc., 337 F.Supp.2d 1195 (N.D.Cal.2004) 19.17

Perfect 10, Inc v CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102, 1117 (9th Cir. 2007) 19.10

Perfect 10, Inc v Giganews, Inc., 993 F.Supp.2d 1192, 1200 (C.D. Cal. 2014) 19.10

Playboy Enters v Chuckleberry Publ’g Inc, 939 F Supp 1032 (SDNY 1996) 28.11

Quality King Distributors Inc v L’anza Research International Inc, 9 March 1998 11.48

Religious Tech. Ctr. v Netcom On-Line Comm. Svcs., 907 F.Supp. 1361, 1377 (N.D. Cal. 1995) 19.09

Rosen v Global Net Access, LLC, CV 10-2721-DMG, 2014 WL 2803752 at *5 (C.D. Cal. 2014) 19.10

Rossi v Motion Picture Ass’n of Am Inc., 391 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir.2004) 19.17, 19.32

Sterling Drug Inc v. Bayer, 14 F 3d 733 (2d Cir 1994) 28.11

Stern v Lavender, 319 F.Supp.3d 650, 683 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 19.17

Square Ring, Inc v Doe-1, No. 09-563, 2015 WL 307840, at *7 (D. Del. Jan. 23, 2015) 19.10

Suntrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin Co, 252 F.3d 1165 (11th Cir. 2001) 4.20

UMG Recordings, Inc v Shelter Capital Partners LLC, 718 F.3d 1006, 1020 (9th Cir. 2013) 19.10, 19.14

UMG Recordings, Inc v Veoh Networks Inc., 665 F. Supp. 2d 1099, 1111 (C.D. Cal. 2009) 19.10

United States v Terminal Railroad Ass'n, 224 US 383 (1912) 4.19

Ventura Content Ltd v Motherless, Inc., 885 F.3d 597 (9th Cir. 2018) 19.04

Verizon v Trinko 540 US 398 (2004) 4.19

Viacom Int’l, Inc v YouTube Inc, 676 F.3d 19, 39 (2d Cir. 2012) 19.10, 19.11, 19.14

Viacom International, Inc. v YouTube, Inc., 940 F.Supp.2d 110, 116–17 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 19.11

Wallace v IBM 467 F.3d 1104 (7th Circ, 2006) 4.25