Show Less
You do not have access to this content

EU COPYRIGHT LAW

A Commentary

IRINI STAMATOUDI, PAUL TORREMANS

This significantly revised and updated second edition addresses the rapid development of EU copyright law in relation to the advancement of new technologies, the need for a borderless digital market and the considerable number of EU legal instruments enacted as a result. Taking a comparative approach, the Commentary provides comprehensive coverage and in-depth commentary on each of the EU legal instruments and policies, both from an EU and an international perspective. Alongside full legislative analysis and article-by-article commentary, the Commentary illustrates the underlying basic principles of free movement and non-discrimination and provides insights into the influence of copyright on other areas of EU policy, including telecoms and bilateral trade agreements.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: THE SOFTWARE DIRECTIVE

Marie-Christine Janssens

Extract

The computer programs Directive was first announced in the Commission White Paper entitled ‘Completing the Internal Market’ and its substance has been influenced, inter alia, by the results of a comprehensive consultation undertaken in the context of the June 1988 ‘Green Paper on Copyright and the Challenge of Technology’. Following this exercise, a proposal for a Directive was submitted on 5 January 1989. Although the Commission had taken care to reflect a balance between the interests of right holders, of their competitors and of users of computer programs, the proposal met substantial criticism in Parliament and acted as a starting shot for extensive lobbying that was put in motion, focusing in particular on the (narrow) scope of the exceptions to the broad exclusive rights. The Commission had to introduce an Amended Proposal which paved the way for the formal adoption of the Directive on 14 May 1991. It became the first harmonising Directive among the many more that the Commission would put in place in the field of copyright. This Directive is a good example of a real harmonising Directive because of its precise instructions, leaving the Member States little discretion for deviation. This may be explained by the fact that not all Member States had already enacted an explicit protection scheme for computer programs. On all the matters that are addressed in the Directive fairly uniform legal rules have been put in place throughout the EU.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.