Edited by David Martin Jones, Paul Schulte, Carl Ungerer and M. L.R. Smith
Chapter 21: A tale of two strategies: the enduring African legacies of Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb
The nomenclature, ‘Islamic terrorism,’ implies that terrorism is somehow caused by or correlated with the religion of Islam, thereby implicating 2.2 billion Muslims in some of the most nefarious crimes against humanity. In this chapter, I deconstruct this unfortunate misnomer. The very heart of my thesis rests upon the argument that terrorist violence is a tactic employed toward a specific strategic objective (political concessions). As such, it is not caused by anything. Nor is it necessarily correlated with the religion of Islam. Still, the knee-jerk reaction has been to paint all Islamist groups with the same terrorist brush. This ‘one-suicide-vest-fits-all’ approach offers obvious political benefits for those who employ it. Regimes cash in on military support, financial assistance and international recognition for their part in the global war on terrorism (GWOT). Islamist groups also benefit. By claiming an alliance with al-Qaeda or Islamic State, the potential for recruits and funding also multiplies to the extent that the struggle is depicted as an epic battle between good and evil rather than a local squabble over resources. Finally, the franchises also win via the illusion of global presence and the opportunity to potentially tap into local resources.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.