Society, Regulation and Governance
Show Less

Society, Regulation and Governance

New Modes of Shaping Social Change?

Edited by Regine Paul, Marc Mölders, Alfons Bora, Michael Huber and Peter Münte

Society, Regulation and Governance brings together sociologists, political scientists, legal scholars and historians for an interdisciplinary critical evaluation of alleged ‘new modes’ of social change, specifically risk, publics and participation. The editors’ aim is to refocus scholarly attention on the possibility of intentional social change in contemporary society which underpin all novelty claims in regulation and governance research and practice. This book gives significant insight into the new methods of social change, suiting a wide range of social science academics due to its collaborative nature.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Why states think about risk differently: the case of workplace safety regulation in France and the UK

Henry Rothstein and Anne-Laure Beaussier


This chapter explains how the inevitable trade-offs between risk and cost in occupational health and safety (OHS) regulation are managed across EU member states. While trade-offs are explicitly sanctioned in UK law with a risk-based regulatory strategy, many continental countries mandate ambitious goals of safety. This contrast in statutory goals appears to reflect cleavages identified in the risk regulation literature between European precaution and Anglo-Saxon neoliberal risk-taking, as well as in the Varieties of Capitalism literature which suggests that workers are better protected in coordinated than in liberal market economies. However, that claim is challenged through a detailed analysis of OHS regimes in the UK and France, which shows that a narrow focus on headline regulatory goals misses how each country makes cost–benefit trade-offs on safety. In particular, the chapter shows how the nature and outcome of those trade-offs substantially vary according to the degree of coupling between regulation and welfare regimes, and national traditions of common and civil law. As such, the chapter offers a novel explanation for risk regulation and governance variety that emphasizes deep institutional differences among welfare states in the organization of the political economy and their philosophies of regulation. While risk-based rationalization may count as a universal strategy to shape societal outcomes intentionally despite the limits of contemporary governance, our findings evidence stark institutional and ideational limits of such novel regulatory approaches. The empirical identification of these diffusion limits also reflects that what is and is not “shapeable”, and how it continues to differ across settings.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.