Society, Regulation and Governance
Show Less

Society, Regulation and Governance

New Modes of Shaping Social Change?

Edited by Regine Paul, Marc Mölders, Alfons Bora, Michael Huber and Peter Münte

Society, Regulation and Governance brings together sociologists, political scientists, legal scholars and historians for an interdisciplinary critical evaluation of alleged ‘new modes’ of social change, specifically risk, publics and participation. The editors’ aim is to refocus scholarly attention on the possibility of intentional social change in contemporary society which underpin all novelty claims in regulation and governance research and practice. This book gives significant insight into the new methods of social change, suiting a wide range of social science academics due to its collaborative nature.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Regulating teaching quality: comparing quality regulation in English and German higher education

Michael Huber

Abstract

Academic quality was historically a problem of professional self-regulation. Since the late 1980s, higher education (HE) quality was targeted by an emerging regulatory regime while professional influence was reduced. We find that on one side the New Public Management reforms attempted to rationalize the control of quality; on the other side we observe that increased rationalization leads to either informal strategies that provide the possibility to flexibly adapt to a volatile environment, but do so by opacity and lack of control, or the emergence of strategies of reflexive (or responsive) regulation. Reflexivity may be interpreted as a more subtle form of rationalization as well as a response to the intangible HE quality (and ways of making it tangible). This paper outlines basic conceptual considerations of the main elements of reflexive regulation and how the reflexivity would vary with the dominant form of funding the HE system. The empirical section of the paper compares the English and German HE teaching quality regimes. It first outlines the basic structures of quality regulation and emerging forms of regulatory reflexivity: ‘risk-based regulation’ in England and concepts like ‘quality culture’ in Germany. It then shows that regulatory reflexivity assumes – as predicted – different patterns in these two countries. Irrespective of some common aspects we can characterize the English quality regulation by its emphasis on procedural reflexivity while the German case highlights the organizational side of reflexivity. Given its ability to capture new empirical developments in HE in a nuanced manner, the concept of regulatory reflexivity serves as a valuable contribution to the analysis of recent political reforms, not least vis-à-vis governance concepts.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.