Society, Regulation and Governance
Show Less

Society, Regulation and Governance

New Modes of Shaping Social Change?

Edited by Regine Paul, Marc Mölders, Alfons Bora, Michael Huber and Peter Münte

Society, Regulation and Governance brings together sociologists, political scientists, legal scholars and historians for an interdisciplinary critical evaluation of alleged ‘new modes’ of social change, specifically risk, publics and participation. The editors’ aim is to refocus scholarly attention on the possibility of intentional social change in contemporary society which underpin all novelty claims in regulation and governance research and practice. This book gives significant insight into the new methods of social change, suiting a wide range of social science academics due to its collaborative nature.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Shaping pressure: on the regulatory effects of publicity

Marc Mölders

Abstract

Although regulation theory has been frequently criticized for overemphasizing the role of the state and legal instruments in shaping society, it has also accounted early for the relevance of “social pressures”. Several scholars even conclude that this kind of pressure may outweigh the effectiveness of state instruments. This view is shared in newer systems theoretical approaches, which claim that, while direct intervention is impossible, irritation remains an option. Irritation shows when idiosyncratic addressees stop executing their usual problem solving routine. Still, it is up to them how to proceed. Despite different axiomatic starting points, regulation and systems theory would agree that dissemination of scandalizing revelations was the basic mechanism to prevent misconduct. However, this view may be better suited to describe the events of a century ago. Do these hundred years, which include the diffusion of national and worldwide broadcasting culminating with the internet, really make no significant difference with regard how decrying messages appear on relevant screens in a hardly ignorable, and thus pressurizing, way? This chapter’s answer is ambivalent. What has actually changed (and what has remained the same) is examined with reference to one of today’s most successful successors of the early muckrakers: ProPublica. It shows that applying pressure is hard work calling for an elaborated irritation design. Relying on a wide diffusion is not considered an option. Rather, it is deemed crucial to find sites – sometimes very small ones in terms of circulation figures – where the assumed targets can consider a relevant means of orientation. Applying, or rather, shaping pressure appears as an organizable task whose impact is not left to chance.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.