An Essential Companion
Edited by Kolja Raube, Meltem Müftüler-Baç and Jan Wouters
Chapter 22: Parliamentary deliberation in inter-regional relations: insights from the ACP-EU JPA
A deliberative approach to inter-parliamentary debate sees inter-regional parliamentary assemblies as promoters of dialogue and mutual understanding, rather than as decision-making bodies. This chapter assesses the quality of deliberation in the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the European Union and Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP-EU JPA) through the development of an analytical framework based on the theoretical perspective of parliamentary deliberation. This framework is applied to analyse the quality of the ACP-EU JPA debates on the Economic Partnership Agreements, which is a strongly divisive subject in ACP–EU relations and which the ACP-EU JPA achieves consensus on. Ultimately, the analysis finds that the ACP–EU JPA dialogue on Economic Partnership Agreements struggles to approach the ideal type of deliberation due to recurring critical issues. Nevertheless, the evidence demonstrates that the ACP-EU JPA as an illustration of deliberation can be considered added value for inter-parliamentary cooperation between the EU and the ACP.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.